Sagittal abdominal diameter compared with other anthropometric measurements in relation to cardiovascular risk

被引:105
|
作者
Öhrvall, M [1 ]
Berglund, L [1 ]
Vessby, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci Geriatr, Clin Nutr Res Unit, SE-75125 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
sagittal abdominal diameter; anthropometric measurement; cardiovascular risk;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ijo.0801186
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Abdominal adiposity has been described as an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease. Sagittal abdominal diameter has been found to be closely related to the amount of visceral adipose tissue. AIM: To compare the sagittal abdominal diameter with other anthropometric measures regarding their relationships to risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). DESIGN: A study of 885 men and women participating in a health survey. MEASUREMENTS: Sagittal abdominal diameter, body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumferences, waist-to-hip ratio, serum concentrations of risk factors for CHD, blood pressure. RESULTS: In men the sagittal abdominal diameter showed stronger correlations to the CHD risk factors serum cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, insulin, apolipoprotein B (apoB), plasminogen activator inhibitor tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and lipid-corrected alpha tocopherol, and to systolic and diastolic blood pressures than the other anthropometric measurements. In women, compared with the other anthropometric measurements the sagittal abdominal diameter was more strongly correlated to serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, LDL/HDL (high-density lipoprotein), apo B and t-PA, and to systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The sagittal abdominal diameter showed a stronger correlation to 'total risk' for cardiovascular disease (+ 0.66 for men, + 0.62 for women), than waist circumference (+ 0.63 for men, + 0.57 for women) and waist-to-hip ratio (+ 0.61 for men and + 0.48 for women; P < 0.0001 for all correlations). This diameter was also more strongly correlated to 'metabolic risk' (+ 0.64 for men, + 0.59 for women) than waist circumference (+ 0.60 for men, + 0.59 for women) and waist-to-hip ratio (+ 0.58 for men, + 0.52 for women)(P < 0.0001 for all correlations). In a regression analysis including the anthropometric measurements and the risk values, the sagittal diameter was the strongest measure of cardiovascular risk in both men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Among both men and women in this study the sagittal abdominal diameter showed stronger correlations to cardiovascular risk and to other risk factors in the metabolic syndrome than other anthropometric variables such as waist circumference, waist-to hip ratio and BMI.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 501
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Sagittal abdominal diameter compared with other anthropometric measurements in relation to cardiovascular risk
    M Öhrvall
    L Berglund
    B Vessby
    International Journal of Obesity, 2000, 24 : 497 - 501
  • [2] Sagittal abdominal diameter: no advantage compared with other anthropometric measures as a correlate of components of the metabolic syndrome in elderly from the Hoorn Study
    Mukuddem-Petersen, Janine
    Snijder, Marieke B.
    van Dam, Rob M.
    Dekker, Jacqueline M.
    Bouter, Lex M.
    Stehouwer, Coen D. A.
    Heine, Robert J.
    Nijpels, Giel
    Seidell, Jacob C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2006, 84 (05) : 995 - 1002
  • [3] Sagittal abdominal diameter is more predictive of cardiovascular risk than abdominal fat compartments in severe obesity
    G Guzzaloni
    A Minocci
    P Marzullo
    A Liuzzi
    International Journal of Obesity, 2009, 33 : 233 - 238
  • [4] Sagittal abdominal diameter is more predictive of cardiovascular risk than abdominal fat compartments in severe obesity
    Guzzaloni, G.
    Minocci, A.
    Marzullo, P.
    Liuzzi, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2009, 33 (02) : 233 - 238
  • [5] Sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and BMI
    de Souza N.C.
    de Oliveira E.P.
    Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 12 (1)
  • [6] Different measurements of waist circumference and sagittal abdominal diameter and their relationship with cardiometabolic risk factors in elderly men
    Anunciacao, P. C.
    Ribeiro, R. C. L.
    Pereira, M. Q.
    Comunian, M.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2014, 27 (02) : 162 - 167
  • [7] Sagittal abdominal diameter and waist circumference appear to be equally good as identifiers of cardiometabolic risk
    Moller, Grith
    Ritz, Christian
    Kjolbaek, Louise
    Vuholm, Stine
    Korndal, Sanne Kellebjerg
    Larsen, Thomas Meinert
    Pedersen, Oluf
    Saris, Wim
    Astrup, Arne
    Lauritzen, Lotte
    Kristensen, Mette
    Lind, Mads Vendelbo
    NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2021, 31 (02) : 518 - 527
  • [8] Anthropometric measurements of general and central obesity and discriminative capacity on cardiovascular risk: RICARTO study
    Segura-Fragoso, A.
    Rodriguez-Padial, L.
    Alonso-Moreno, F. J.
    Villarin-Castro, A.
    Rojas-Martelo, G. A.
    Rodriguez-Roca, G. C.
    Sanchez-Perez, M.
    MEDICINA DE FAMILIA-SEMERGEN, 2019, 45 (05): : 323 - 332
  • [9] The impact of using sagittal abdominal diameter to predict major cardiovascular events in European patients with type 2 diabetes
    Radholm, K.
    Tengblad, A.
    Dahlen, E.
    Lanne, T.
    Engvall, J.
    Nystrom, F. H.
    Ostgren, C. J.
    NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 27 (05) : 418 - 422
  • [10] The synthesis of the rough set model for the better applicability of sagittal abdominal diameter in identifying high risk patients
    Stokic, Edita
    Brtka, Vladimir
    Srdic, Biljana
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2010, 40 (09) : 786 - 790