Comparative Study of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis for Identifying Benign and Malignant Breast Tumor Lumps

被引:30
作者
Liu, Jian [1 ]
Gao, Yun-Hua [1 ]
Li, Ding-Dong [2 ]
Gao, Yan-Chun [2 ]
Hou, Ling-Mi [2 ]
Xie, Ting [2 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Xinqiao Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chuanbei Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Nanchong, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Ultrasonography; breast nodules; qualitative; quantitative; analysis; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY; LESIONS; VASCULARITY; FLOW;
D O I
10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.19.8149
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To compare the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) qualitative and quantitative analysis in the identification of breast tumor lumps. Materials and Methods: Qualitative and quantitative indicators of CEUS for 73 cases of breast tumor lumps were retrospectively analyzed by univariate and multivariate approaches. Logistic regression was applied and ROC curves were drawn for evaluation and comparison. Results: The CEUS qualitative indicator-generated regression equation contained three indicators, namely enhanced homogeneity, diameter line expansion and peak intensity grading, which demonstrated prediction accuracy for benign and malignant breast tumor lumps of 91.8%; the quantitative indicator-generated regression equation only contained one indicator, namely the relative peak intensity, and its prediction accuracy was 61.5%. The corresponding areas under the ROC curve for qualitative and quantitative analyses were 91.3% and 75.7%, respectively, which exhibited a statistically significant difference by the Z test (P<0.05). Conclusions: The ability of CEUS qualitative analysis to identify breast tumor lumps is better than with quantitative analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:8149 / 8153
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Interactive visual analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound data based on small neighborhood statistics [J].
Angelelli, Paolo ;
Nylund, Kim ;
Gilja, Odd Helge ;
Hauser, Helwig .
COMPUTERS & GRAPHICS-UK, 2011, 35 (02) :218-226
[2]  
Barnard S, 2008, SAMJ S AFR MED J, V98, P386
[3]   Comparison of Mammography in Combination with Breast Ultrasonography Versus Mammography Alone for Breast Cancer Screening in Asymptomatic Women [J].
Boonlikit, Sarawan .
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2013, 14 (12) :7731-7736
[4]   Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterisation of breast masses: utility of quantitative analysis in comparison with MRI [J].
Caproni, Natalia ;
Marchisio, Francesca ;
Pecchi, Annarita ;
Canossi, Barbara ;
Battista, Rachele ;
D'Alimonte, Piero ;
Torricelli, Pietro .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (06) :1384-1395
[5]   VEGF and angiogenesis: implications for breast cancer therapy [J].
Drevs, Joachim .
EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 6 (06) :7-13
[6]   Microvascular architecture of breast lesions - Evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic micro flow imaging [J].
Du, Jing ;
Li, Feng-Hua ;
Fang, Hua ;
Xia, Jian-Guo ;
Zhu, Cai-Xia .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (06) :833-842
[7]   Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: Combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Du, Jing ;
Wang, Lin ;
Wan, Cai-Feng ;
Hua, Jia ;
Fang, Hua ;
Chen, Jie ;
Li, Feng-Hua .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (12) :3890-3899
[8]   Sonographic depiction of tumor vascularity and flow: From in vivo models to clinical applications [J].
Fleischer, AC .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2000, 19 (01) :55-61
[9]   Perfusion quantification using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound: The impact of dynamic range and gain on time-intensity curves [J].
Gauthier, Thomas P. ;
Averkiou, Michalakis A. ;
Leen, Edward L. S. .
ULTRASONICS, 2011, 51 (01) :102-106
[10]   Quantitative contrast enhanced ultrasound of the liver for time intensity curves-Reliability and potential sources of errors [J].
Ignee, Andre ;
Jedrejczyk, Maciej ;
Schuessler, Gudrun ;
Jakubowski, Wieslaw ;
Dietrich, Christoph F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 73 (01) :153-158