Comparative evaluation of three semi-quantitative radiographic grading techniques for hip osteoarthritis in terms of validity and reproducibility in 1404 radiographs: report of the OARSI-OMERACT Task Force

被引:49
作者
Gossec, L. [1 ]
Jordan, J. M. [2 ]
Lam, M. -A.
Fang, F. [2 ]
Renner, J. B. [2 ]
Davis, A. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Hawker, G. A. [3 ,4 ]
Dougados, M.
Maillefert, J. F. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Paris Descartes Univ, Fac Med, Cochin Hosp,Rheumatol Dept B, AP HP,Serv Rhumatol B,UPRES EA 4058, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Univ N Carolina, Thurston Arthritis Res Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Womens Coll Hosp, Dept Med, Div Rheumatol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Toronto Western Res Inst, Div Hlth Care & Outcomes Res, Arthritis & Community Res & Evaluat Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Rehabil Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Dijon Univ Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, F-21078 Dijon, France
[8] Univ Burgondy, F-21079 Dijon, France
[9] INSERM, U887, F-21079 Dijon, France
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Hip; Osteoarthritis; Progression; Radiography; Validity; Reproducibility; Kellgren-Lawrence; Joint space width; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; JOINT REPLACEMENT; ARTHROPLASTY; RELIABILITY; RHEUMATOLOGY; DEFINITIONS; PROGRESSION; PREDICTORS; SYMPTOMS; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.joca.2008.06.009
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this work was to compare the measurement properties of three categorical X-ray scoring methods for hip osteoarthritis (CA). Methods: In data obtained from trials and cohorts, radiographs were evaluated using the Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grading system, the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) joint space narrowing score, and quantitative measurement of joint space width (JSW), analysed as a categorical variable according to Croft and Lane's cutoffs (1.5, 2.5 and 3 mm). Predictive validity was assessed through logistic regression to predict joint replacement in one database. Construct validity was assessed through logistic regression between pain and function and X-ray stages. Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability were assessed in 50 subjects by weighted kappa. Sensitivity to change was assessed in 50 patients over a 24-month interval, by standardized response mean (SRM). Results: Radiographs were available from one trial and two cohorts (1404 X-rays). All three methods predicted joint replacement in the trial. Correlation with clinical parameters was low for the three scoring methods, except for the single community-based cohort. Interrater reliability was higher for categorical JSW (kappa, 0.71 vs 0.44 and 0.47 for KL and OARSI, respectively). Intrarater reliability was similar for the three methods (0.79 vs 0.69 and 0.81). Sensitivity to change was higher for categorical JSW than KL and OARSI (SRM, 0.77 vs 0.28 and 0.35). Conclusion: Categorical JSW has similar validity and higher sensitivity to change than the other categorical scoring techniques in hip OA. These results indicate categorical JSW may be the preferred method to evaluate structural severity in hip OA clinical trials. (C) 2008 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 187
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   THE AMERICAN-COLLEGE-OF-RHEUMATOLOGY CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND REPORTING OF OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP [J].
ALTMAN, R ;
ALARCON, G ;
APPELROUTH, D ;
BLOCH, D ;
BORENSTEIN, D ;
BRANDT, K ;
BROWN, C ;
COOKE, TD ;
DANIEL, W ;
FELDMAN, D ;
GREENWALD, R ;
HOCHBERG, M ;
HOWELL, D ;
IKE, R ;
KAPILA, P ;
KAPLAN, D ;
KOOPMAN, W ;
MARINO, C ;
MCDONALD, E ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
MEDSGER, T ;
MICHEL, B ;
MURPHY, WA ;
OSIAL, T ;
RAMSEYGOLDMAN, R ;
ROTHSCHILD, B ;
WOLFE, F .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1991, 34 (05) :505-514
[2]   RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESSION IN OSTEOARTHRITIS [J].
ALTMAN, RD ;
FRIES, JF ;
BLOCH, DA ;
CARSTENS, J ;
COOKE, D ;
GENANT, H ;
GOFTON, P ;
GROTH, H ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
MURPHY, WA ;
SHARP, JT ;
SPITZ, P ;
WILLIAMS, CA ;
WOLFE, F .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1987, 30 (11) :1214-1225
[3]  
ALTMAN RD, 1995, OSTEOARTHR CARTILAGE, V3, P3
[4]  
Bellamy N., 1996, WOMAC. Osteoarthritis Index. A user's guide
[5]  
Birrell F, 2003, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V53, P26
[6]  
Boers M, 1998, J RHEUMATOL, V25, P198
[7]   The effects of position on the radiographic joint space in osteoarthritis of the hip [J].
Conrozier, T ;
Lequesne, MG ;
Tron, AM ;
Mathieu, P ;
Berdah, L ;
Vignon, E .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1997, 5 (01) :17-22
[8]   RECOMMENDED METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE PROGRESSION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP AND KNEE JOINTS [J].
DIEPPE, PA .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1995, 3 (02) :73-77
[9]  
Dougados M, 2001, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V44, P2539, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200111)44:11<2539::AID-ART434>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-T