Comparison of IPSM 1990 photon dosimetry code of practice with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51

被引:7
作者
Castrillon, Silvia Vargas [1 ]
Henriquez, Francisco Cutanda [1 ]
机构
[1] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, NW Med Phys, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
关键词
photon beam dosimetry; code of practice; absorbed dose to water; IPSM; IAEA; AAPM; HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON; BEAM QUALITY SPECIFICATION; MED; PHYS; 27; PROTOCOL; WATER;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2810
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Several codes of practice for photon dosimetry are currently used around the world, supported by different organizations. A comparison of IPSM 1990 with both IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 has been performed. All three protocols are based on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of standards of absorbed dose to water, as it is the case with other modern codes of practice. This comparison has been carried out for photon beams of nominal energies: 4 MV, 6 MV, 8 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV. An NE 2571 graphite ionization chamber was used in this study, cross-calibrated against an NE 2611A Secondary Standard, calibrated in the National Physical Laboratory (NPL). Absolute dose in reference conditions was obtained using each of these three protocols including: beam quality indices, beam quality conversion factors both theoretical and NPL experimental ones, correction factors for influence quantities and absolute dose measurements. Each protocol recommendations have been strictly followed. Uncertainties have been obtained according to the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Absorbed dose obtained according to all three protocols agree within experimental uncertainty. The largest difference between absolute dose results for two protocols is obtained for the highest energy: 0.7% between IPSM 1990 and IAEA TRS-398 using theoretical beam quality conversion factors.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 146
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
ALLISYROBERTS PJ, 1999, CCRII991 BIPM
[2]   AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams [J].
Almond, PR ;
Biggs, PJ ;
Coursey, BM ;
Hanson, WF ;
Huq, MS ;
Nath, R ;
Rogers, DWO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (09) :1847-1870
[3]   ABSORBED DOSE BEAM QUALITY FACTORS FOR THE DOSIMETRY OF HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON BEAMS [J].
ANDREO, P .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1992, 37 (12) :2189-2211
[4]   Reply to "Comment on 'On the beam quality specification of high-energy photons for radiotherapy dosimetry' " [Med. Phys. 27, 441-444 (2000)] [J].
Andreo, P .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (07) :1693-1695
[5]   A comparison between calculated and experimental kQ photon beam quality correction factors [J].
Andreo, P .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (09) :L25-L38
[6]   On the beam quality specification of high-energy photons for radiotherapy dosimetry [J].
Andreo, P .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (03) :434-440
[7]  
Andreo P, 2000, IAEA TECHNICAL REPOR
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2006, METROLOGIA, DOI [10.1088/0026-1394/43/1A/06005, DOI 10.1088/0026-1394/43/1A/06005]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2007, EXPR UNC CONF MEAS
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1997, 68002 DIN