An evaluation of ThinPrep UroCyte filters for the preparation of slides for fluorescence in situ hybridization

被引:13
作者
Kipp, Benjamin R.
Campion, Michael B.
Coffman, Erin
Smith, Arthur
Tomisek, John D.
Browne, Gerry G.
Panella, Jeffrey R.
Desai, Rutuja
Harwood, Aaron R.
Halling, Kevin C.
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Cytyc Corp, Marlborough, MA USA
[3] Abbott Mol Inc, De Plaines, IL USA
关键词
FISH; UroVysion; urine; cytology; bladder cancer;
D O I
10.1002/dc.20488
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of Thin-Prep (R) UroCyte (TM) filters, which were designed specifically for the preparation of slides for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of urine specimens. One hundred urine specimens were evenly split, and one portion was utilized to prepare a slide with the UroCyte filter method and the other portion was used to prepare a slide with a manual dropping method. All 17 of the 100 specimens identified as positive by the manual method were also identified as positive with the UroCyte method. No significant differences were noted in the percentage of chromosomally abnormal cells (P = 0.227), cellularity (P = 0.857), signal quality (P = 0.816), and DAPI counterstain quality (P = 0.369) between the two methodologies. The average time taken to prepare a batch of 10 slides using the UroCyte method, and that using manual method was 103 min (10.3 min/case) and 194 min (19.4 min/case), respectively. This study suggests that the UroCyte filter method of preparing slides for FISH analysis reduces the time required to prepare these slides with overall results that are similar to the currently utilized manual dropping method.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 484
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Bubendorf L, 2001, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V116, P79
  • [2] A comparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of urothelial carcinoma
    Halling, KC
    King, W
    Sokolova, IA
    Meyer, RG
    Burkhardt, HM
    Halling, AC
    Cheville, JC
    Sebo, TJ
    Ramakumar, S
    Stewart, CS
    Pankratz, S
    O'Kane, DJ
    Seelig, SA
    Lieber, MM
    Jenkins, RB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05) : 1768 - 1775
  • [3] Monitoring intravesical therapy for superficial bladder cancer using fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Kipp, BR
    Karnes, RJ
    Brankley, SM
    Harwood, AR
    Pankratz, VS
    Sebo, TJ
    Blute, MM
    Lieber, MIM
    Zincke, H
    Halling, KC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (02) : 401 - 404
  • [4] Use of ThinPrep® monolayer technique and cytospin preparation in urine cytology:: A comparative analysis
    Nassar, H
    Ali-Fehmi, R
    Madan, S
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 28 (03) : 115 - 118
  • [5] Clinical evaluation of a multi-target fluorescent in situ hybridization assay for detection of bladder cancer
    Sarosdy, MF
    Schellhammer, P
    Bokinsky, G
    Kahn, P
    Chao, R
    Yore, L
    Zadra, J
    Burzon, D
    Osher, G
    Bridge, JA
    Anderson, S
    Johansson, SL
    Lieber, M
    Soloway, M
    Flom, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (05) : 1950 - 1954
  • [6] Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology
    Skacel, M
    Fahmy, M
    Brainard, JA
    Pettay, JD
    Biscotti, CV
    Liou, LS
    Procop, GW
    Jones, JS
    Ulchaker, J
    Zippe, CD
    Tubbs, RR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06) : 2101 - 2105
  • [7] Skacel M, 2001, ANAL QUANT CYTOL, V23, P381
  • [8] Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an ancillary tool to urine cytology in diagnosing urothelial carcinoma
    Veeramachaneni, R
    Nordberg, ML
    Shi, RH
    Herrera, GA
    Turbat-Herrera, EA
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 28 (06) : 301 - 307