Comparison of chevron and suspended-zipper braced steel frames

被引:19
作者
Ozcelik, Yigit [1 ]
Saritas, Afsin [2 ]
Clayton, Patricia M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Steel structures; Concentrically braced frames; Chevron braced frames; Suspended-zipper braced frames; Nonlinear static analysis; Nonlinear time-history analysis; RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTORS; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; BEAM; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.12.019
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Suspended-zipper braced frame is a modified configuration of chevron braced frame in which zipper columns are added between story beams and a hat truss is attached between top two stories in order to redistribute the unbalanced vertical forces emerging following the brace buckling to avoid the use of deep beams. In this study, three- and nine-story chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames are analyzed to compare their seismic performances. The beams, columns, braces and zipper columns are modeled using nonlinear force-formulation frame elements and nonlinear geometric effects are included by utilizing corotational transformation. Nonlinear static analyses are performed until reaching a roof drift ratio of 3% and a set of twenty ground motion records scaled to match a 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years is used for nonlinear time-history analysis. The results appear to indicate that the lateral load capacity and drift demands for both low-rise chevron and suspended zipper braced frames are very similar; however, the mid-rise chevron braced frame has a better performance compared to the mid-rise suspended-zipper braced frame. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 175
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Seismic behavior of braced steel frames with pipe dampers [J].
Abdollahiparsa, Hossein ;
Mahboubi, Behnam ;
Zohari, Alireza ;
Abdollahiparsa, Saeid .
ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 24 (08) :1526-1538
[32]   Effect of the Brace Design Method on the Seismic Response of Chevron Braced Frames [J].
Yu Haifeng ;
Zou Dandan .
CIVIL ENGINEERING IN CHINA - CURRENT PRACTICE AND RESEARCH REPORT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, :418-422
[33]   Prediction of the Bending Moments in Columns of Concentrically Braced Frames in the Chevron Configuration [J].
Bosco, Melina ;
Floridia, Andrea ;
Marino, Edoardo ;
Rossi, Pier Paolo .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, STESSA 2022, 2022, 262 :1064-1071
[34]   Proposal and validation of a design procedure for concentrically braced frames in the chevron configuration [J].
Barbagallo, Francesca ;
Bosco, Melina ;
Marino, Edoardo M. ;
Rossi, Pier Paolo .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2021, 50 (11) :3041-3063
[35]   Experimental seismic behavior of SCFRT column chevron concentrically braced frames [J].
Zhao, Bingzhen ;
Zhou, Ting ;
Chen, Zhihua ;
Yu, Jinghai ;
Yan, Xiangyu ;
Zheng, Peizhuang ;
Zhao, Zhongwei .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2017, 133 :141-155
[36]   Seismic behavior evaluation of zipper braced steel frames based on push-over and incremental dynamic analyses [J].
Esfandiari, J. ;
Khezeli, Y. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2019, 16 (03) :401-411
[37]   Steel Structures Research Update System Behavior and Collapse Assessment of Braced Frames [J].
Liu, Judy .
ENGINEERING JOURNAL-AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 52 (04) :283-295
[38]   Lateral cyclic behavior of zipper braced frames-considering connection details [J].
Rahimi, R. ;
Banan, Mo. R. ;
Banan, Ma. R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEEL STRUCTURES, 2016, 16 (01) :11-21
[39]   SEISMIC RESPONSE OF CONCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL FRAMES [J].
REDWOOD, RG ;
LU, F ;
BOUCHARD, G ;
PAULTRE, P .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1991, 18 (06) :1062-1077
[40]   Progressive Collapse Analysis of Steel Braced Frames [J].
Naji, Arash ;
Zadeh, Mohamad Khodaverdi .
PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 24 (02)