Implementable tensor methods in unconstrained convex optimization

被引:65
作者
Nesterov, Yurii [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain UCL, Ctr Operat Res & Econometr CORE, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
High-order methods; Tensor methods; Convex optimization; Worst-case complexity bounds; Lower complexity bounds; CUBIC REGULARIZATION; EVALUATION COMPLEXITY; 1ST-ORDER METHODS; HIGHER-ORDER;
D O I
10.1007/s10107-019-01449-1
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper we develop new tensor methods for unconstrained convex optimization, which solve at each iteration an auxiliary problem of minimizing convex multivariate polynomial. We analyze the simplest scheme, based on minimization of a regularized local model of the objective function, and its accelerated version obtained in the framework of estimating sequences. Their rates of convergence are compared with the worst-case lower complexity bounds for corresponding problem classes. Finally, for the third-order methods, we suggest an efficient technique for solving the auxiliary problem, which is based on the recently developed relative smoothness condition (Bauschke et al. in Math Oper Res 42:330-348, 2017; Lu et al. in SIOPT 28(1):333354, 2018). With this elaboration, the third-order methods become implementable and very fast. The rate of convergence in terms of the function value for the accelerated third-order scheme reaches the level O(1/k(4)), where k is the number of iterations. This is very close to the lower bound of the order O(1/k(5)), which is also justified in this paper. At the same time, in many important cases the computational cost of one iteration of this method remains on the level typical for the second-order methods.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 183
页数:27
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ARXIV171010329V1MATH
[2]  
Arjevani Y., 2017, ARXIV170507260MATHOC
[3]  
BAES M, 2009, OPTIM ONLINE, V2009, P2372
[4]   A Descent Lemma Beyond Lipschitz Gradient Continuity: First-Order Methods Revisited and Applications [J].
Bauschke, Heinz H. ;
Bolte, Jerome ;
Teboulle, Marc .
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 42 (02) :330-348
[5]   Complexity analysis of interior point algorithms for non-Lipschitz and nonconvex minimization [J].
Bian, Wei ;
Chen, Xiaojun ;
Ye, Yinyu .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2015, 149 (1-2) :301-327
[6]   On the use of third-order models with fourth-order regularization for unconstrained optimization [J].
Birgin, E. G. ;
Gardenghi, J. L. ;
Martinez, J. M. ;
Santos, S. A. .
OPTIMIZATION LETTERS, 2020, 14 (04) :815-838
[7]   Worst-case evaluation complexity for unconstrained nonlinear optimization using high-order regularized models [J].
Birgin, E. G. ;
Gardenghi, J. L. ;
Martinez, J. M. ;
Santos, S. A. ;
Toint, Ph. L. .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2017, 163 (1-2) :359-368
[8]  
Carmon Y., 2017, ARXIV171100841
[9]  
Carmon Y., 2017, ARXIV171011606
[10]   UNIVERSAL REGULARIZATION METHODS: VARYING THE POWER, THE SMOOTHNESS AND THE ACCURACY [J].
Cartis, Coralia ;
Gould, Nick, I ;
Toint, Philippe L. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 2019, 29 (01) :595-615