Mercury Capture within Coal-Fired Power Plant Electrostatic Precipitators: Model Evaluation

被引:16
作者
Clack, Herek L. [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT, Dept Mech Mat & Aerosp Engn, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
关键词
PARTICLE MASS-TRANSFER; ACTIVATED CARBON; SULFUR-OXIDES; ADSORPTION; IMPACT; COMBUSTION; EMISSIONS; ASH;
D O I
10.1021/es8015183
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Efforts to reduce anthropogenic mercury emissions worldwide have recently focused on a variety of sources, including mercury emitted during coal combustion. Toward that end, much research has been ongoing seeking to develop new processes for reducing coal combustion mercury emissions. Among air pollution control processes that can be applied to coal-fired boilers, electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) are by far the most common, both on a global scale and among the principal countries of India, China, and the U.S. that burn coal for electric power generation. A previously reported theoretical model of in-flight mercury capture within ESPs is herein evaluated against data from a number of full-scale tests of activated carbon injection for mercury emissions control. By using the established particle size distribution of the activated carbon and actual or estimated values of its equilibrium mercury adsorption capacity, the incremental reduction in mercury concentration across each ESP can be predicted and compared to experimental results. Because the model does not incorporate kinetics associated with gas-phase mercury transformation or surface adsorption, the model predictions represent the mass-transfer-limited performance. Comparing field data to model results reveals many facilities performing at or near the predicted mass-transfer-limited maximum, particularly at low rates of sorbent injection. Where agreement is poor between field data and model predictions, additional chemical or physical phenomena may be responsible for reducing mercury removal efficiencies.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1466
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
*ADA ENV SOL, DEFC2600NT41005 US D
[2]  
*ADA ENV SOL, 2003, DEFC2600NT41005 US D
[3]  
BECKER W, 2007, PRES VIRG MERC S NOV
[4]   Bimodal fly ash size distributions and their influence on gas-particle mass transfer during electrostatic precipitation [J].
Clack, Herek L. .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 87 (11) :987-996
[5]   Mass transfer within electrostatic precipitators: Trace gas adsorption by sorbent-covered plate electrodes [J].
Clack, Herek L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2006, 56 (06) :759-766
[6]   Mass transfer within electrostatic precipitators: In-flight adsorption of mercury by charged suspended particulates [J].
Clack, Herek L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (11) :3617-3622
[7]   Particle size distribution effects on gas-particle mass transfer within electrostatic precipitators [J].
Clack, Herek L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (12) :3929-3933
[8]  
Crowley J. M., 1986, FUNDAMENTALS APPL EL
[9]  
CUSHING KM, 2007, P AIR QUAL 6 C CRYST
[10]  
FEELEY TJ, 2008, UPDATE DOE NETLS MER