Predicting scores of the Halstead Category Test with the WAIS-III

被引:4
作者
Titus, JB
Retzlaff, PD
Dean, RS
机构
[1] Ball State Univ, Neuropsychol Lab, Muncie, IN 47306 USA
[2] Univ No Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639 USA
关键词
category test; Halstead-Reitan battery; normals; WAIS;
D O I
10.1080/00207450290026085
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The Halstead Category Test (HCT) and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) are two of the most widely used neuropsychological tests. Often assessment conclusions are dependent upon the comparison of these measures. Therefore, it is crucial for clinicians to know how they relate to one another. This study examined the relationship between the HCT and the WAIS-III with undergraduate psychology students. Correlational analyses were conducted between HCT scores and WAIS-III subtests, Verbal and Performance IQ, and Full Scale IQ scores. Additionally, the new WAIS-III scales (Letter-Number Sequencing, Matrix Reasoning, and Symbol Search) were further examined. Regression analyses were run to develop predictor equations for the HCT using VIQ, PIQ, and FSIQ. Finally, predictor tables were generated between the HCT and VIQ, PIQ, and FSIQ to provide assessment of brain dysfunction for clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1114
页数:16
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Aiken L.R., 1994, PSYCHOL TESTING ASSE, V8th
[2]  
Anastasi A., 1988, Psychological testing
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, HALSTEAD REITAN NEUR
[4]  
BIGLER ED, 1982, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, V3, P5
[5]   PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF RUSSEL SHORT-FORM OF THE BOOKLET CATEGORY TEST [J].
BOYLE, GJ ;
WARD, J ;
STEINDL, SR .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1994, 79 (01) :128-130
[6]  
CORRIGAN JD, 1987, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V43, P368, DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(198705)43:3<368::AID-JCLP2270430309>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-F
[8]  
CULLUM CM, 1984, INT J CLIN NEUROPSYC, V3, P172
[9]   A COMPARISON BETWEEN INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING [J].
DAMATO, RC ;
GRAY, JW ;
DEAN, RS .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 26 (03) :283-292
[10]  
DEFILIPPIS NA, 1979, RELIABILITY VALIDITY