Comparison of dragonfly algorithm and Harris hawks optimization evolutionary data mining techniques for the assessment of bearing capacity of footings over two-layer foundation soils

被引:68
作者
Moayedi, Hossein [1 ,2 ]
Abdullahi, Mu'azu Mohammed [3 ]
Nguyen, Hoang [4 ]
Rashid, Ahmad Safuan A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Dept Management Sci & Technol Dev, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Univ Hafr Al Batin, Civil Engn Dept, Hafar al Batin 39524, Eastern Provinc, Saudi Arabia
[4] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[5] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Ctr Trop Geoengn Geotrop, Johor Baharu, Malaysia
关键词
Bearing capacity analysis; Dragonfly algorithm; Evolutionary science; SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS; ROCK MASSES; PREDICTION; SLOPE; MODEL; LOAD; PILE; ANN;
D O I
10.1007/s00366-019-00834-w
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
By assist of novel evolutionary science, the classification accuracy of neural computing is improved in analyzing the bearing capacity of footings over two-layer foundation soils. To this end, Harris hawks optimization (HHO) and dragonfly algorithm (DA) are applied to a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) predictive tool for adjusting the connecting weights and biases in predicting the failure probability using seven settlement key factors, namely unit weight, friction angle, elastic modulus, dilation angle, Poisson's ratio, applied stress, and setback distance. As the first result, incorporating both HHO and DA metaheuristic algorithms resulted in higher efficiency of the MLP. Moreover, referring to the calculated area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC), as well as the calculated mean square error, the DA-MLP (AUC = 0.942 and MSE = 0.1171) outperforms the HHO-MLP (AUC = 0.915 and MSE = 0.1350) and typical MLP (AUC = 0.890 and MSE = 0.1416). Furthermore, the DA surpassed the HHO in terms of time-effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 447
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Finite element and ANN-based prediction of bearing capacity of square footing resting on the crest of c-φ soil slope [J].
Acharyya, Rana ;
Dey, Arindam ;
Kumar, Bimlesh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 14 (02) :176-187
[2]   2D Numerical Analysis of Shallow Foundation Rested Near Slope under Inclined Loading [J].
Baazouzi, Messaoud ;
Benmeddour, Djamel ;
Mabrouki, Abdelhak ;
Mellas, Mekki .
ADVANCES IN TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS III, 2016, 143 :623-634
[3]  
Baginska M, 2019, KSCE J CIV ENG, V23, P130
[4]   Load-displacement and bearing capacity of foundations on granular soils using a multi-surface kinematic constitutive soil model [J].
Banimahd, M. ;
Woodward, P. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 2006, 30 (09) :865-886
[5]   A Novel Hybrid Harris Hawks Optimization for Color Image Multilevel Thresholding Segmentation [J].
Bao, Xiaoli ;
Jia, Heming ;
Lang, Chunbo .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 (76529-76546) :76529-76546
[6]   Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management [J].
Beguería, S .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2006, 37 (03) :315-329
[7]   Prediction of ultimate bearing capacity of eccentrically inclined loaded strip footing by ANN, part I [J].
Behera, R. N. ;
Patra, C. R. ;
Sivakugan, N. ;
Das, B. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 7 (01) :36-44
[8]  
Bowles J.E., 1996, Foundation analysis and design, V5th
[9]   Static and seismic bearing capacity of shallow strip footings [J].
Cascone, Ernesto ;
Casablanca, Orazio .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 84 :204-223
[10]  
Cigizoglu HK, 2005, NORD HYDROL, V36, P49