Ecosystem based multi-species management using Empirical Dynamic Programming

被引:19
作者
Brias, Antoine [1 ]
Munch, Stephan B. [1 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Southwest Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA
关键词
Multi-species management; Multi-objectives management; Non-linear methods; Approximate dynamic programming; Gaussian process regression; Temporal difference learning; MARKOV DECISION-PROCESSES; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; GAUSSIAN-PROCESSES; TRADE-OFFS; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; RECRUITMENT; FISHERIES; CONSERVATION; FORESTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109423
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Control theory and stochastic dynamic programming have long been used to develop optimal single-species management policies. However, most species interact with others through competition and predation as parts of complex ecosystems. As a consequence, it is unclear how far from optimal the single species policies currently in use actually are. Moreover, there are as yet no scalable algorithms for optimal ecosystem management. Here, we merge recently developed tools from machine learning and nonlinear dynamics to construct and evaluate near-optimal policies in multi-species systems. Specifically, a non-parametric model for the dynamics is estimated from time series data using Gaussian process-based dynamic modeling. A policy is then derived from the inferred dynamics using a temporal difference learning algorithm. Policy performance is benchmarked against single-species policies and the ad hoc ecosystem policies that have been previously offered. We found that EDP policies are closer to the true optimal policies than single-species policies in multi-species systems with two controls and three objectives. The Pareto fronts illustrate the flexibility of EDP policies compared with single-species policies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, SCI REP
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, TECH REP
  • [3] Pollution control with uncertain stock dynamics: When, and how, to be precautious
    Athanassoglou, Stergios
    Xepapadeas, Anastasios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 63 (03) : 304 - 320
  • [4] When optimization for governing human-environment tipping elements is neither sustainable nor safe
    Barfuss, Wolfram
    Donges, Jonathan F.
    Lade, Steven J.
    Kurths, Juergen
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 9
  • [5] Avoiding tipping points in fisheries management through Gaussian process dynamic programming
    Boettiger, Carl
    Mangel, Marc
    Munch, Stephan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 282 (1801)
  • [6] Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology
    Bolnick, Daniel I.
    Amarasekare, Priyanga
    Araujo, Marcio S.
    Buerger, Reinhard
    Levine, Jonathan M.
    Novak, Mark
    Rudolf, Volker H. W.
    Schreiber, Sebastian J.
    Urban, Mark C.
    Vasseur, David A.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2011, 26 (04) : 183 - 192
  • [7] Risk-sensitive optimal control for Markov decision processes with monotone cost
    Borkar, VS
    Meyn, SP
    [J]. MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2002, 27 (01) : 192 - 209
  • [8] Is age structure a relevant criterion for the health of fish stocks?
    Brunel, Thomas
    Piet, GerJan J.
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2013, 70 (02) : 270 - 283
  • [9] Habitat conservation, wildlife extraction and agricultural expansion
    Bulte, EH
    Horan, RD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (01) : 109 - 127