Application of agent-based modeling and life cycle sustainability assessment to evaluate biorefinery placement

被引:7
作者
Zupko, Robert [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Technol Univ, Dept Social Sci, 1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Ctr Infect Dis Dynam, W252 Millennium Sci Complex, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Agent-based modeling; Life cycle sustainability assessment; Biofuels; Forests; Woody biomass; Integrated hydropyrolysis and hydroconversion; BIOFUELS; BIODIVERSITY; INDICATORS; PRINCIPLES; RESIDUES; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105916
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Biofuels, such as those derived from woody biomass, are being developed as one part of a renewable energy portfolio; however, it remains unclear if they can be sustainably developed. This manuscript demonstrates that the use of agent-based modeling (ABM) and life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) as part of an integrated methodology allows for robust assessment of the possible impacts. A case study of a proposed biorefinery in Ontonagon, Michigan, USA is conducted. In the case study, ABM is used to project the harvest decision making of forest owners and loggers to determine if they were willing to harvest and supply woody biomass to the biorefinery under several different price points. The results from the ABM were used to inform inventory data for projections of environmental impacts, along with projected impacts for economic and social concerns. The results of the case study show that while Ontonagon is a promising site for a biorefinery, the quantity of woody biomass delivered is a concern along with potential impacts to wetlands in the region. Ultimately, this case study suggestions that the integration of ABM and LCSA may be effective the assessment of other biorefineries.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Abbas D, 2014, CROAT J FOR ENG, V35, P179
[2]   Non-industrial private forest owner's willingness-to-harvest: How higher timber prices influence woody biomass supply [J].
Aguilar, Francisco X. ;
Cai, Zhen ;
D'Amato, Anthony W. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 71 :202-215
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, US LIF CYCL INV DAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, EPA420R07004
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU10082739
[6]  
Axtell R, 2000, 17 BROOK I
[7]   Uncertainty analysis in agent-based modelling and consequential life cycle assessment coupled models: A critical review [J].
Baustert, Paul ;
Benetto, Enrico .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 156 :378-394
[8]   Biodiesel-triple bottom line (TBL): A new hierarchical sustainability assessment framework of principles criteria & indicators (PC&I) for biodiesel production. Part II-validation [J].
Bautista, S. ;
Enjolras, M. ;
Narvaez, P. ;
Camargo, M. ;
Morel, L. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 69 :803-817
[9]   Agent-based life cycle assessment for switchgrass-based bioenergy systems [J].
Bichraoui-Draper, Najet ;
Xu, Ming ;
Miller, Shelie A. ;
Guillaume, Bertrand .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2015, 103 :171-178
[10]  
Bliss JC, 2000, J FOREST, V98, P4