Empirical Comparison of Design/Build and Design/Bid/Build Project Delivery Methods

被引:195
作者
Hale, Darren R. [1 ]
Shrestha, Pramen P. [2 ]
Gibson, G. Edward, Jr. [3 ]
Migliaccio, Giovanni C. [4 ]
机构
[1] USN, Publ Works Dept, Norfolk, VA 23521 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Coll Engn, Construct Management Program, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[4] Univ New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Bids; Construction costs; Construction management; Design/build; Military engineering;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000017
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study compares the performance of design/bid/build and design/build to see if one project delivery method is superior in regards to time and cost. Similar military buildings were used to identify two samples of projects delivered with each of the two delivery methods. These projects provide a meaningful comparison because they include buildings of the same typology (i.e., U.S. Navy Bachelor Enlisted Quarters) delivered using similar design models. Project duration, project duration per bed, project time growth, cost growth and cost per bed were statistically compared. Upon completion of the analysis, the hypothesis that design/build projects are superior to design/bid/build projects in regards to time and cost was tested. Design/build projects were proven superior in performance in almost every measure. Other findings, including recommendations to practitioners and researchers, will be provided as well.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 587
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
*AIR FORC, 2005, HIST AIR FORC CONSTR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Statistics: Methods and Applications
[3]  
Bennett J., 1996, DESIGNING BUILDING W
[4]  
Hale Darren R., 2005, An empirical comparison of design-build and design-bid-build project delivery methods
[5]   Project delivery systems and project change: Quantitative analysis [J].
Ibbs, CW ;
Kwak, YH ;
Ng, T ;
Odabasi, AM .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2003, 129 (04) :382-387
[6]   Comparison of US project delivery systems [J].
Konchar, M ;
Sanvido, V .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1998, 124 (06) :435-444
[7]  
Loulakis MichaelC., 2003, DESIGN BUILD PUBLIC
[8]   Public-sector design/build evolution and performance [J].
Molenaar, KR ;
Songer, AD ;
Barash, M .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 1999, 15 (02) :54-62
[9]  
Roth MB, 1995, THESIS U TEXAS AUSTI
[10]  
Shrestha PP, 2007, TRANSPORT RES REC, P17