Ethics and AI in Information Systems Research

被引:23
作者
Mirbabaie, Milad [1 ]
Brendel, Alfred Benedikt [2 ]
Hofeditz, Lennart [3 ]
机构
[1] Paderborn Univ, Dept Informat Syst, Paderborn, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Business & Econ, Dresden, Germany
[3] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Comp Sci & Appl Cognit Sci, Duisburg, Germany
来源
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 2022年 / 50卷 / 01期
关键词
Ethics; Artificial Intelligence; Discourse Approach; Review Article; Information Systems; DECISION-SUPPORT; COMPUTER; ALGORITHMS; FUTURE; CODES; CUES;
D O I
10.17705/1CAIS.05034
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The ethical dimensions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) constitute a salient topic in information systems (IS) research and beyond. There is an increasing number of journal and conference articles on how AI should be designed and used. For this, IS research offers and curates knowledge not only on the ethical dimensions of information technologies but also on their acceptance and impact. However, the current discourse on the ethical dimensions of AI is highly unstructured and seeks clarity. As conventional systematic literature research has been criticized for lacking in performance, we applied an adapted discourse approach to identify the most relevant articles within the debate. As the fundamental manuscripts within the discourse were not obvious, we used a weighted citation-based technique to identify fundamental manuscripts and their relationships within the field of AI ethics across disciplines. Starting from an initial sample of 175 papers, we extracted and further analyzed 12 fundamental manuscripts and their citations. Although we found many similarities between traditionally curated ethical principles and the identified ethical dimensions of AI, no IS paper could be classified as fundamental to the discourse. Therefore, we derived our own ethical dimensions on AI and provided guidance for future IS research.
引用
收藏
页码:726 / 753
页数:28
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Abbasi Ahmed, 2018, Harvard Business Review
[2]   When Algorithmic Predictions Use Human-Generated Data: A Bias-Aware Classification Algorithm for Breast Cancer Diagnosis [J].
Ahsen, Mehmet Eren ;
Ayvaci, Mehmet Ulvi Saygi ;
Raghunathan, Srinivasan .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (01) :97-116
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Harvard Business Review
[4]   Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions [J].
Araujo, Theo .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2018, 85 :183-189
[5]   When decision support systems fail: Insights for strategic information systems from Formula 1 [J].
Aversa, Paolo ;
Cabantous, Laure ;
Haefliger, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 27 (03) :221-236
[6]   Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI [J].
Barredo Arrieta, Alejandro ;
Diaz-Rodriguez, Natalia ;
Del Ser, Javier ;
Bennetot, Adrien ;
Tabik, Siham ;
Barbado, Alberto ;
Garcia, Salvador ;
Gil-Lopez, Sergio ;
Molina, Daniel ;
Benjamins, Richard ;
Chatila, Raja ;
Herrera, Francisco .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 58 :82-115
[7]  
Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (BAAI), 2019, BEIJ PRINC
[8]   Special Issue Editorial: Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: Implications for Information Systems Research [J].
Benbya, Hind ;
Pachidi, Stella ;
Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L. .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 22 (02) :281-303
[9]  
Berente N., 2021, MIS QUART, V45, P1433, DOI [DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2021/16274, 10.25300/MISQ/2021/16274]
[10]   Watch Me Improve-Algorithm Aversion and Demonstrating the Ability to Learn [J].
Berger, Benedikt ;
Adam, Martin ;
Ruehr, Alexander ;
Benlian, Alexander .
BUSINESS & INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2021, 63 (01) :55-68