Understanding the differences of public and private self-service technology

被引:58
作者
Collier, Joel E. [1 ]
Sherrell, Daniel L. [2 ]
Babakus, Emin [2 ]
Horky, Alisha Blakeney [3 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Mkt, Starkville, MS 39759 USA
[2] Univ Memphis, Dept Mkt & Supply Chain Management, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Mkt Quantitat Anal & Business Law, Starkville, MS USA
关键词
Control; Convenience; Hedonic; Self-service technology; Technical anxiety; Utilitarian; SATISFACTION; UTILITARIAN; ONLINE; CONVENIENCE; MOTIVATION; CUSTOMERS; DELIVERY; ADOPTION; ANXIETY; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1108/JSM-04-2012-0071
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential differences between types of self-service technology. Specifically, the paper explores how the dynamics of public and private self-service technology influence customers' decision to use the technology. Design/methodology/approach - Existing customers of private and public self-service technology were surveyed from the same industry. Using structural equation modeling, the authors examine how relevant self-service constructs influence evaluations and attitudes of customers across both settings. Findings - The analysis reveals that customers' control and convenience perceptions differ across public and private self-service technology. Additionally, customers placed a heavier emphasis on the hedonic or utilitarian evaluation of a service experience based on the type of self-service technology. Practical implications - For managers of self-service applications, understanding the unique differences of public and private self-service technology can aid in the implementation and adoption of the technology. By properly understanding the differences of the self-service types, managers can provide a beneficial experience to the customer. Originality/value - By identifying and describing two distinct categories of SSTs, this study allows managers and researchers to better understand how and why individuals choose to utilize individual self-service technologies. Through understanding the unique dynamics of a public and a private SST experience, retailers can determine the appropriate strategy for customer adoption based on the utilitarian or hedonic functions of the technology.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 70
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, International Journal of Research in Marketing, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00027-5, DOI 10.1016/0167-8116%2895%2900027-5]
[3]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[4]   WORK AND OR FUN - MEASURING HEDONIC AND UTILITARIAN SHOPPING VALUE [J].
BABIN, BJ ;
DARDEN, WR ;
GRIFFIN, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1994, 20 (04) :644-656
[5]  
BATESON JEG, 1985, J RETAILING, V61, P49
[6]   Understanding service convenience [J].
Berry, LL ;
Seiders, K ;
Grewal, D .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2002, 66 (03) :1-17
[7]   SERVICESCAPES - THE IMPACT OF PHYSICAL SURROUNDINGS ON CUSTOMERS AND EMPLOYEES [J].
BITNER, MJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1992, 56 (02) :57-71
[8]  
Cambre M. A., 1985, Journal of Educational Computing Research, V1, P37, DOI 10.2190/FK5L-092H-T6YB-PYBA
[9]   Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior [J].
Childers, TL ;
Carr, CL ;
Peck, J ;
Carson, S .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2001, 77 (04) :511-535
[10]   Examining the influence of control and convenience in a self-service setting [J].
Collier, Joel E. ;
Sherrell, Daniel L. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2010, 38 (04) :490-509