Multi-objective evolutionary optimization of polynomial neural networks for modelling and prediction of explosive cutting process

被引:93
作者
Jamali, A. [1 ]
Nariman-zadeh, N. [1 ,2 ]
Darvizeh, A. [1 ]
Masoumi, A. [3 ]
Hamrang, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guilan, Dept Mech Engn, Fac Engn, Rasht, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Fac Engn, Sch Mech Engn, Intelligent Based Expt Mech Ctr Excellence, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran, Fac Mech Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Explosive cutting; Multi-objective optimization; Genetic algorithms; GMDH; Pareto; GENETIC-ALGORITHMS; DESIGN; IDENTIFICATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2008.11.005
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are deployed for multi-objective Pareto optimal design of group method of data handling (GMDH)-type neural networks which have been used for modelling an explosive cutting process using some input-output experimental data. In this way, multi-objective EAs (non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm, NSGA-II) with a new diversity-preserving mechanism are used for Pareto optimization of such GMDH-type neural networks. The important conflicting objectives of GMDH-type neural networks that are considered in this work are, namely. training error (TE), prediction error (PE), and number of neurons (N) of such neural networks. Different pairs of theses objective functions are selected for 2-objective optimization processes. Therefore, optimal Pareto fronts of such models are obtained in each case which exhibit the trade-off between the corresponding pair of conflicting objectives and, thus, provide different non-dominated optimal choices of GMDH-type neural networks models for explosive cutting process. Moreover, all the three objectives are considered in a 3-objective optimization process, which consequently leads to some more non-dominated choices of GMDH-type models representing the trade-offs among the training error, prediction error, and number of neurons (complexity of network), simultaneously. The overlay graphs of these Pareto fronts also reveal that the 3-objective results include those of the 2-objective results and, thus, provide more optimal choices for the multi-objective design of GMDH-type neural networks in terms of minimum training error, minimum prediction error, and minimum complexity. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 687
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SELF ORGANISING DATA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems
[3]  
[Anonymous], SELF ORGANIZING METH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Genetic programming IV: routine human-competitive machine intelligence
[5]   SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION - SURVEY [J].
ASTROM, KJ ;
EYKHOFF, P .
AUTOMATICA, 1971, 7 (02) :123-+
[6]   Thermodynamic Pareto optimization of turbojet engines using multi-objective genetic algorithms [J].
Atashkari, K ;
Nariman-Zadeh, N ;
Pilechi, A ;
Jamali, A ;
Yao, X .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2005, 44 (11) :1061-1071
[7]   Genetic algorithms in materials design and processing [J].
Chakraborti, N .
INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS REVIEWS, 2004, 49 (3-4) :246-260
[8]   Multiobjective optimization of trusses using genetic algorithms [J].
Coello, CA ;
Christiansen, AD .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2000, 75 (06) :647-660
[9]   Evolutionary multiobjective optimization using a cultural algorithm [J].
Coello, CAC ;
Becerra, RL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 IEEE SWARM INTELLIGENCE SYMPOSIUM (SIS 03), 2003, :6-13
[10]  
Coello-Coello C.A., 1998, Knowledge and Informaiton Systems, V1, P269