Understanding resource commitment to R&D in multinational enterprises: a novel conceptual framework

被引:0
作者
le Duc, Niels [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Int Econ Business & Govt, Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
Multinational enterprise; Resource commitment; Research and development; Resource-based view; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; FOREIGN-MARKET; ENTRY; FIRM; KNOWLEDGE; LOCATION; INTERNATIONALIZATION; EXPLOITATION; INNOVATION; EXPLORATION;
D O I
10.1108/MBR-03-2020-0063
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to introduce and advocate the concept of resource commitment to better understand multinational enterprise (MNE) research and development (R&D) behavior. Design/methodology/approach Adopting a theory adaptation research design, this paper assesses the characteristics and antecedents associated with varying resource commitment positions. It does so in relation to MNE R&D activities, considering their importance to firm competitiveness and the recent increases in the number of locations and innovative activities a firm might choose to invest in. Findings The paper presents a framework showing that differences in resource commitment are more nuanced than expected. The evaluation of antecedents shows that the external environment, the purpose of R&D activities and firm experience influence the resource commitment position of a firm's R&D activities. Originality/value The paper provides a pathway toward understanding of MNE R&D behavior, explaining observable differences in resource and commitment levels of R&D units. The presented framework offers MNE managers insight into when to adopt which resource commitment positions. It offers policymakers insights into the type of activities and the companies they need to attract to maximize the added value of firm's investments in their country/region.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 280
页数:19
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   International risk perceptions and mode of entry: a case study of Malaysian multinational firms [J].
Ahmed, ZU ;
Mohamad, O ;
Tan, B ;
Johnson, JP .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2002, 55 (10) :805-813
[2]   Meeting the challenge of offshoring R&D: an examination of firm- and location-specific factors [J].
Ambos, Bjoern ;
Ambos, Tina C. .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2011, 41 (02) :107-119
[3]  
Anderson Erin, 1988, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V4, P305
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, OECD SCI TECHNOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.1787/STI_SCOREBOARD-2009-39-EN
[5]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[6]   Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J].
Benner, MJ ;
Tushman, ML .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) :238-256
[7]  
Birkinshaw JM, 1995, J INT BUS STUD, V26, P729, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490818
[8]   The internationalisation of R&D by multinationals:: a trade-off between external and internal proximity [J].
Blanc, H ;
Sierra, C .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 23 (02) :187-206
[9]  
CANTWELL J, 1995, CAMBRIDGE J ECON, V19, P155
[10]   MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates [J].
Cantwell, J ;
Mudambi, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (12) :1109-1128