Environmental Tax, Polluting Plants' Strategies and Effectiveness: Evidence from China

被引:28
作者
He, Pan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Bing [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Sch Environm, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, 2181 Samuel J LeFrak Hall,7251 Preinkert Dr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Nanjing Univ, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Sch Environm, Sch Govt, Room 228,163 Xianlin Ave, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; POLICY; ENFORCEMENT; INNOVATION; PROGRAM; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1002/pam.22052
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although environmental taxes have become a popular policy tool, their effectiveness for pollution control and impact on the compliance strategies of agents remains questionable. This research uses a quasi-experimental design to examine the effectiveness of the Pay for Permit policy, an environmental tax that has been imposed on water pollution emissions in Lake Tai Basin, Jiangsu, China, since 2009. A plant-level panel dataset from 2007 to 2010 is used for both difference-in-differences and difference-in-difference-in-differences analyses to compare the pollution discharge, pollution abatement, and pollution generation of policy participants and control groups. The results indicate that treated plants reduce their emissions by about 40 percent after two years of the policy implementation. Thus, the policy generated approximately a 7 percent decrease in the industrial chemical oxygen demand emission in the entire Lake Tai Basin based on the emission level of 2007. Pollution is primarily reduced via end-of-pipe abatement instead of cleaner production. Our results show the effectiveness of environmental taxes in controlling industrial pollution, and indicate that the tax may not motivate the adoption of innovative techniques in the short term.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / +
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does the environmental protection tax reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Yin, Qiuyue
    Lin, Yongsheng
    Yuan, Bo
    Dong, Zhanfeng
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (48) : 106198 - 106213
  • [32] Tax incentive and firm investment: Evidence from the Income Tax Revenue Sharing Reform in China
    Fang, Hongsheng
    Su, Yunqing
    Lu, Weijun
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2022, 62 (05) : 4849 - 4884
  • [33] Political connections, environmental violations and punishment: Evidence from heavily polluting firms
    Florackis, Chris
    Fu, Xi
    Wang, Jingjing
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 88
  • [34] Environmental tax incentives and corporate environmental behaviour: An unintended consequence from a natural experiment in China
    Boubaker, Sabri
    Cheng, Feiyang
    Liao, Jing
    Yue, Shuai
    EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 30 (02) : 800 - 838
  • [35] Asymmetric corporate tax compliance: Evidence from a tax reform in China
    Cheng, Hua
    Chen, Xiaowei
    Qi, Shusen
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2023, 79
  • [36] Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China
    Dean, Judith M.
    Lovely, Mary E.
    Wang, Hua
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2009, 90 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [37] Environmental tax reform roles and strategies of local governments: A quasi-natural experiment from China
    Chu, Tianyang
    SUSTAINABLE FUTURES, 2025, 9
  • [38] How Does Environmental Tax Influence the Scale and Efficiency of Green Investment among China's Heavily Polluting Enterprises?
    Zhao, Lingxiao
    Tang, Yunpeng
    Liu, Yan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (20)
  • [39] Environmental Compliance and Firm Performance: Evidence from China
    Yang, Xi
    Yao, Yang
    OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2012, 74 (03) : 397 - 424
  • [40] Environmental Regulation, Corporate Economic Performance and Spatial Technology Spillover: Evidence from China's Heavily Polluting Listed Corporations
    Gu, Xuesong
    An, Xiaoran
    Liu, Andong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (03)