Rushing for subsidies: The impact of feed-in tariffs on solar photovoltaic capacity development in China

被引:77
作者
Dong, Changgui [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Runmin [1 ]
Li, Jiaying [1 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Natl Acad Dev & Strategy, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
关键词
Solar photovoltaic; Feed-in tariff; Rushing for subsidy; Difference-in-difference; China; RENEWABLE ENERGY; POLICY; POWER; CONSUMPTION; COUNTRIES; SYSTEM; PV; GENERATION; DEPLOYMENT; MECHANISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116007
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Governments across countries often offer dynamic subsidies to clean technologies that decrease over time. However, the impact of government subsidies on technology deployment is difficult to gauge due to many confounding factors and the selection bias problem caused by the phenomenon of rushing for subsidies. This study takes China's solar photovoltaic (PV) as an example, and uses a difference-in-difference framework that leverages China's zonal feed-in tariff (FIT) policy design and its multiple changes over time. The parallel rushing for subsidies by two neighboring FIT zones provides a unique opportunity to identify the causal effect of FIT policy on newly installed PV capacity. Results show that an increase of 0.1 yuan/kWh (similar to$0.014/kWh) in PV subsidies adds about 18 GW/year of installed capacity to the national PV market, right in the middle of previous estimates in the literature. From a different perspective, if China did not have any PV subsidies, the PV deployment market would virtually disappear. The cost of carbon mitigation through PV feed-in tariffs is esti-mated at around 120 yuan (similar to$17) per ton of CO2. Our estimate of the impact of FIT on PV capacity is useful for the government to design policies that help the PV industry transit to a subsidy-free era.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   The doping effect of Italian feed-in tariffs on the PV market [J].
Antonelli, Marco ;
Desideri, Umberto .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 67 :583-594
[2]   Global Renewable Electricity Policy: A Comparative Policy Analysis of Countries by Income Status [J].
Baldwin, Elizabeth ;
Carley, Sanya ;
Brass, Jennifer N. ;
MacLean, Lauren M. .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2017, 19 (03) :277-298
[3]   Geographical and environmental perspectives for the sustainable development of renewable energy in urbanizing China [J].
Bao, Chao ;
Fang, Chuang-lin .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 27 :464-474
[4]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[5]   An analysis of feed'in tariffs for solar PV in six representative countries of the European Union [J].
Campoccia, A. ;
Dusonchet, L. ;
Telaretti, E. ;
Zizzo, G. .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2014, 107 :530-542
[6]   THE EFFECT OF MINIMUM WAGES ON LOW-WAGE JOBS [J].
Cengiz, Doruk ;
Dube, Arindrajit ;
Lindner, Attila ;
Zipperer, Ben .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2019, 134 (03) :1405-1454
[7]   Providing the Spark: Impact of financial incentives on battery electric vehicle adoption [J].
Clinton, Bentley C. ;
Steinberg, Daniel C. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 98
[8]   Are policy incentives for solar power effective? Evidence from residential installations in the Northeast [J].
Crago, Christine Lasco ;
Chernyakhovskiy, Ilya .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 :132-151
[9]   Subsidies and Time Discounting in New Technology Adoption: Evidence from Solar Photovoltaic Systems [J].
De Groote, Olivier ;
Verboven, Frank .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 109 (06) :2137-2172
[10]   Support for solar PV deployment in Spain: Some policy lessons [J].
del Rio, Pablo ;
Mir-Artigues, Pere .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (08) :5557-5566