Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing is associated with increased physician utilisation

被引:39
|
作者
Bloss, Cinnamon S. [1 ,2 ]
Schork, Nicholas J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Topol, Eric J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Translat Sci Inst, Scripps Genom Med, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] Scripps Hlth, La Jolla, CA USA
[3] Scripps Res Inst, Dept Mol & Expt Med, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[4] Scripps Clin, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词
direct-to-consumer; genetic testing; personalized medicine; genomic risk assessment; consumer genomics; RISK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101909
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing has generated controversy, however the actual impact of testing on consumer behaviour has been understudied, particularly for pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing. Methods We recruited a sample of adults who purchased a DTC genomic test and had previously received their genomic test results for complex disease risk. All participants additionally underwent PGx testing. At follow-up, to assess the impact of PGx testing on consumer behaviour, healthcare utilisation and psychological status were compared between approximately a third of participants who had received their PGx results and the remaining two-thirds of participants who were still awaiting results. The PGx test included genetic testing for drug effectiveness or risk of side effects for 12 medications. Results At follow-up, there were 481 PGx test recipients and 844 non-recipients still awaiting results. PGx test recipients had more physician visits (p=0.04) and were more likely to share their results with their physician (p=0.001). Both groups showed a decrease in anxiety symptoms from baseline to follow-up, with a trend for PGx recipients to show less of a decrease compared with non-recipients (p=0.10). PGx recipients were more likely to report that their physician ordered additional tests (p=0.01) based on their genomic test. There were no group differences in follow-up test-related distress (p=0.67). Conclusions DTC PGx risk profiling among a selected sample of individuals was associated with increased physician utilisation and did not result in any adverse changes in psychological health or follow-up test-related distress.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 89
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies
    J. Scott Roberts
    Jenny Ostergren
    Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 2013, 1 (3) : 182 - 200
  • [42] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for addiction susceptibility: a premature commercialisation of doubtful validity and value
    Mathews, Rebecca
    Hall, Wayne
    Carter, Adrian
    ADDICTION, 2012, 107 (12) : 2069 - 2074
  • [43] Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives
    Goldsmith, Lesley
    Jackson, Leigh
    O'Connor, Anita
    Skirton, Heather
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2012, 20 (08) : 811 - 816
  • [44] Perceptions of genetic counseling services in direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing
    Darst, B. F.
    Madlensky, L.
    Schork, N. J.
    Topol, E. J.
    Bloss, C. S.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2013, 84 (04) : 335 - 339
  • [45] Is there a doctor in the house? The presence of physicians in the direct-to-consumer genetic testing context
    Howard, Heidi Carmen
    Borry, Pascal
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS, 2012, 3 (02) : 105 - 112
  • [46] Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review
    Covolo, Loredana
    Rubinelli, Sara
    Ceretti, Elisabetta
    Gelatti, Umberto
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (12)
  • [47] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: An assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefs
    Hock, Kathryn T.
    Christensen, Kurt D.
    Yashar, Beverly M.
    Roberts, J. Scott
    Gollust, Sarah E.
    Uhlmann, Wendy R.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (04) : 325 - 332
  • [48] Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives
    Lesley Goldsmith
    Leigh Jackson
    Anita O'Connor
    Heather Skirton
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2012, 20 : 811 - 816
  • [49] Is there a doctor in the house?: The presence of physicians in the direct-to-consumer genetic testing context
    Heidi Carmen Howard
    Pascal Borry
    Journal of Community Genetics, 2012, 3 (2) : 105 - 112
  • [50] Nutritional Genomics and Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: An Overview
    Guasch-Ferre, Marta
    Dashti, Hassan S.
    Merino, Jordi
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2018, 9 (02) : 128 - 135