Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing is associated with increased physician utilisation

被引:39
|
作者
Bloss, Cinnamon S. [1 ,2 ]
Schork, Nicholas J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Topol, Eric J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Translat Sci Inst, Scripps Genom Med, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] Scripps Hlth, La Jolla, CA USA
[3] Scripps Res Inst, Dept Mol & Expt Med, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[4] Scripps Clin, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词
direct-to-consumer; genetic testing; personalized medicine; genomic risk assessment; consumer genomics; RISK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101909
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing has generated controversy, however the actual impact of testing on consumer behaviour has been understudied, particularly for pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing. Methods We recruited a sample of adults who purchased a DTC genomic test and had previously received their genomic test results for complex disease risk. All participants additionally underwent PGx testing. At follow-up, to assess the impact of PGx testing on consumer behaviour, healthcare utilisation and psychological status were compared between approximately a third of participants who had received their PGx results and the remaining two-thirds of participants who were still awaiting results. The PGx test included genetic testing for drug effectiveness or risk of side effects for 12 medications. Results At follow-up, there were 481 PGx test recipients and 844 non-recipients still awaiting results. PGx test recipients had more physician visits (p=0.04) and were more likely to share their results with their physician (p=0.001). Both groups showed a decrease in anxiety symptoms from baseline to follow-up, with a trend for PGx recipients to show less of a decrease compared with non-recipients (p=0.10). PGx recipients were more likely to report that their physician ordered additional tests (p=0.01) based on their genomic test. There were no group differences in follow-up test-related distress (p=0.67). Conclusions DTC PGx risk profiling among a selected sample of individuals was associated with increased physician utilisation and did not result in any adverse changes in psychological health or follow-up test-related distress.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 89
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of individual differences in disease perception on consumer response to direct-to-consumer genomic testing
    Boeldt, D. L.
    Schork, N. J.
    Topol, E. J.
    Bloss, C. S.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2015, 87 (03) : 225 - 232
  • [2] Perception of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing and Direct-To-Consumer Advertising of Genetic Tests among Members of a Large Managed Care Organization
    Rahm, Alanna Kulchak
    Feigelson, Heather Spencer
    Wagner, Nicole
    Anh Quynh Le
    Halterman, Eve
    Cornish, Nadine
    Dearing, James W.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2012, 21 (03) : 448 - 461
  • [3] Strategies to Improve the Clinical Outcomes for Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacogenomic Tests
    Tafazoli, Alireza
    Guggilla, Rama Krishna
    Kamel-Koleti, Zahra
    Miltyk, Wojciech
    GENES, 2021, 12 (03) : 1 - 14
  • [4] Diet and exercise changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing
    Nielsen, Daiva Elena
    Carere, Deanna Alexis
    Wang, Catharine
    Roberts, J. Scott
    Green, Robert C.
    BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS, 2017, 10
  • [5] Autobiologies on YouTube: narratives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Harris, Anna
    Kelly, Susan E.
    Wyatt, Sally
    NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2014, 33 (01) : 60 - 78
  • [6] Ethical Issues Associated With Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Panacer, Kirpal S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [7] Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing Experience
    Gollust, Sarah E.
    Gray, Stacy W.
    Carere, Deanna Alexis
    Koenig, Barbara A.
    Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani
    McGuire, Amy L.
    Sharp, Richard R.
    Spector-Bagdady, Kayte
    Wang, Na
    Green, Robert C.
    Roberts, J. Scott
    MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2017, 95 (02) : 291 - 318
  • [8] Size of the direct-to-consumer genomic testing market
    Wright, Caroline F.
    Gregory-Jones, Shelley
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 12 (09) : 594 - 594
  • [9] Predictors of interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Sweeny, Kate
    Legg, Angela M.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2011, 26 (10) : 1259 - 1272
  • [10] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Comprehensive Review
    Jiang, Sharon
    Liberti, Lawrence
    Lebo, David
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2023, 57 (6) : 1190 - 1198