Does environmental regulation reduce China's haze pollution? An empirical analysis based on panel quantile regression

被引:18
作者
Li, Congxin [1 ]
Li, Guozhu [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei GEO Univ, Sch Econ, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
AIR-POLLUTION; INDUSTRY; IMPACTS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0240723
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Haze pollution in China is very serious and has become the source of mortality, affecting the health and lives of residents. The Chinese government adopts different policy measures to reduce haze pollution. The impact of different types of environmental regulations on haze pollution has become a hot topic for academics and government departments. Based on panel data from 2005-2017, this paper studies the effect of different types of environmental regulations on haze pollution in 30 provinces of China using a panel quantile model. The results show that when haze pollution changes from a low quantile to a high quantile, the marginal impact of command-and-control environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from 0.122 to -0.332. Command-and-control environmental regulation can reduce haze pollution, but its impact is not significant. The main reason for this finding is that environmental law enforcement is not strict. The marginal impact of economically restrained environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from -14.389 to 49.939. Economically restrained environmental regulation can reduce haze pollution in low quantiles, but not in high quantiles. The collection of sewage charges fees is far less than the total profit, which has no deterrent effect on enterprises. The marginal impact of public participation in environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from 0.154 to -0.002. Public participation in environmental regulation cannot reduce haze pollution in low quantiles, but can in high quantiles; however its impact becomes insignificant. This study reveals the quantile-based discrepancy in the effect of environmental regulation on haze pollution, and offers a new perspective for research on the effects of environmental regulation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, TOXICOL ANAL CLIN, DOI DOI 10.1080/09602011.2018.1470987
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, MONITOR, V22, P23
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CHRISTIAN STUDIES J, Vviii, P79
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, REGEN MED S3, V7, pS14
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, OBSTET GYNECOL, V13, pe49
[6]   Pareto law-based regional inequality analysis of PM2.5 air pollution and economic development in China [J].
Cao, Kai ;
Zhang, Wenting ;
Liu, Shaobo ;
Huang, Bo ;
Huang, Wei .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 252
[7]   Ecoefficiency, environmental regulation opportunity costs, and interregional industrial transfers: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China [J].
Chen, Jin-Xiao ;
Zhang, Youguo ;
Zheng, Shilin .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 :611-625
[8]  
Chen JP, 2015, ENV PROTECTION, V43, P31
[9]  
[初钊鹏 Chu Zhaopeng], 2019, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V29, P101
[10]  
Colwell J, 2016, CANCER DISCOV, V6, P115, DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2015-176