A comparative study on minimum and actual energy consumption for the treatment of desalination brine

被引:82
作者
Panagopoulos, Argyris [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Chem Engn, 9 Iroon Polytechniou St, Athens 15780, Greece
关键词
Desalination brine; Minimum energy consumption; Thermodynamic analysis model; High salinity; Actual energy consumption; Minimal and zero liquid discharge; CONTACT MEMBRANE DISTILLATION; PRESSURE REVERSE-OSMOSIS; EUTECTIC FREEZE CRYSTALLIZATION; SEAWATER DESALINATION; NANOFIBROUS MEMBRANE; CHLORALKALI INDUSTRY; WATER DESALINATION; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PILOT-SCALE; ELECTRODIALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2020.118733
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Brine is a hyper-saline by-product that is produced in the desalination process. This by-product has an adverse environmental impact due to its high salinity and therefore its treatment is considered necessary. The minimum energy consumption (MEC) has been studied in seawater desalination, but not in brine treatment. In this regard, this research study introduces a mathematical model to calculate the MEC in the desalination brine treatment. Furthermore, the actual energy consumption (AEC) of the desalination technologies is presented. In this model, various parameters, such as the recovery rate, the salinity and the temperature of the feed brine, the purity of the freshwater produced and the dissolved salt nature, are considered. The analysis revealed that the MEC increases by increasing the recovery rate, the feed brine salinity, the feed brine temperature and the purity of the freshwater produced. On the other side, the MEC decreases by increasing the molar mass of the dissolved salt. The AEC is at least two times higher than the MEC due to irreversibility. Most membrane-based technologies are less energyintensive than thermal-based technologies; however, they cannot currently treat significantly high saline brine as do thermal-based technologies. Future advances in materials/system designs are expected to reduce the AECs. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]  
Agalloco J, 2007, VALIDATION PHARM PRO, Vthird
[2]   Influence of temperature and permeate recovery on energy consumption of a reverse osmosis system [J].
Agashichev, SP ;
Lootah, KN .
DESALINATION, 2003, 154 (03) :253-266
[3]   Performance evaluation of a thermoresponsive polyelectrolyte draw solution in a pilot scale forward osmosis seawater desalination system [J].
Ahmed, Mansour ;
Kumar, Rajesha ;
Garudachari, B. ;
Thomas, Jibu P. .
DESALINATION, 2019, 452 :132-140
[4]  
Al-Gobaisi D.M, 2010, THERMAL DESALINATION, VII
[5]   Multi-effect distillation plants: state of the art [J].
Al-Shammiri, M ;
Safar, M .
DESALINATION, 1999, 126 (1-3) :45-59
[6]   Characterizing the fossil fuel impacts in water desalination plants in Kuwait: A Life Cycle Assessment approach [J].
Al-Shayji, Khawla ;
Aleisa, Esra .
ENERGY, 2018, 158 :681-692
[7]   Application of Membrane Crystallization for Minerals' Recovery from Produced Water [J].
Ali, Aamer ;
Quist-Jensen, Cejna Anna ;
Macedonio, Francesca ;
Drioli, Enrico .
MEMBRANES, 2015, 5 (04) :772-792
[8]   Produced water and salinity management: The desalination frontier [J].
Alspach, Brent .
JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2014, 106 (11) :47-52
[9]   Reverse osmosis pretreatment technologies and future trends: A comprehensive review [J].
Anis, Shaheen Fatima ;
Hashaikeh, Raed ;
Hilal, Nidal .
DESALINATION, 2019, 452 :159-195
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2018, EMERGING TECHNOLOGIE