Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve Exist? An International Study

被引:61
作者
Maneejuk, Nutnaree [1 ]
Ratchakom, Sutthipat [1 ]
Maneejuk, Paravee [2 ]
Yamaka, Woraphon [2 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Econ, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Econ, Ctr Excellence Econometr, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
关键词
Environmental Kuznets Curve; kink model; economic development; environment; RENEWABLE ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; CARBON EMISSIONS; DYNAMIC IMPACT; TIME-SERIES; HYPOTHESIS; INCOME; GLOBALIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/su12219117
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study aims to examine the relationship between economic development and environmental degradation based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis. The level of CO2 emissions is used as the indicator of environmental damage to determine whether or not greater economic growth can lower environmental degradation under the EKC hypothesis. The investigation was performed on eight major international economic communities covering 44 countries across the world. The relationship between economic growth and environmental condition was estimated using the kink regression model, which identifies the turning point of the change in the relationship. The findings indicate that the EKC hypothesis is valid in only three out of the eight international economic communities, namely the European Union (EU), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and Group of Seven (G7). In addition, interesting results were obtained from the inclusion of four other control variables into the estimation model for groups of countries to explain the impact on environmental quality. Financial development (FIN), the industrial sector (IND), and urbanization (URB) were found to lead to increasing CO2 emissions, while renewable energies (RNE) appeared to reduce the environmental degradation. In addition, when we further investigated the existence of the EKC hypothesis in an individual country, the results showed that the EKC hypothesis is valid in only 9 out of the 44 individual countries.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Modelling the CO2 emissions and economic growth in Croatia: Is there any environmental Kuznets curve? [J].
Ahmad, Najid ;
Du, Liangsheng ;
Lu, Jiye ;
Wang, Jianlin ;
Li, Hong-Zhou ;
Hashmi, Muhammad Zaffar .
ENERGY, 2017, 123 :164-172
[2]   The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve? [J].
Akbostanci, Elif ;
Turut-Asik, Serap ;
Tunc, G. Ipek .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (03) :861-867
[3]   Estimating the Environment Kuznets Curve hypothesis: Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean countries [J].
Al-mulali, Usama ;
Tang, Chor Foon ;
Ozturk, Ilhan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 :918-924
[4]   Impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economy: Evidence from Pakistan [J].
Ali, Rafaqet ;
Bakhsh, Khuda ;
Yasin, Muhammad Asim .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 48
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Mexico-Bolivia Free Trade Agreement
[6]   Investigating the Energy-Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for the Asia-Pacific Region [J].
Aruga, Kentaka .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08)
[7]   Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across the US: Evidence from panel mean group estimators [J].
Atasoy, Burak Sencer .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 77 :731-747
[8]   The role of renewable energy to validate dynamic interaction between CO2 emissions and GDP toward sustainable development in Malaysia [J].
Bekhet, Hussain Ali ;
Othman, Nor Salwati .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 72 :47-61
[9]   The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions [J].
Bhattacharya, Mita ;
Churchill, Sefa Awaworyi ;
Paramati, Sudharshan Reddy .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 111 :157-167
[10]   The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach [J].
Bilgili, Faik ;
Kocak, Emrah ;
Bulut, Umit .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 54 :838-845