In vitro assessments of nanomaterial toxicity

被引:411
|
作者
Jones, Clinton F. [1 ]
Grainger, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut & Pharmaceut Chem, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
Nanoscience; Nanotechnology; Nanomaterials; Nanotoxicity; In vitro; Bioassays; Toxicology; Particles; WALLED CARBON NANOTUBES; MOUSE PERITONEAL-MACROPHAGES; OXIDANT RADICAL GENERATION; GENE DELIVERY; CELL-LINES; SURFACE MODIFICATION; EPITHELIAL-CELLS; PARTICLE-SIZE; ELECTRON-MICROSCOPY; ULTRAFINE PARTICLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.005
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Nanotechnology has grown from a scientific interest to a major industry with both commodity and specialty nanomaterial exposure to global populations and ecosystems. Sub-micron materials are currently used in a wide variety of consumer products and in clinical trials as drug delivery carriers and imaging agents. Due to the expected growth in this field and the increasing public exposure to nanomaterials, both from intentional administration and inadvertent contact, improved characterization and reliable toxicity screening tools are required for new and existing nanomaterials. This review discusses current methodologies used to assess nanomaterial physicochemicial properties and their in vitro effects. Current methods lack the desired sensitivity, reliability, correlation and sophistication to provide more than limited, often equivocal, pieces of the overall nanomaterial performance parameter space, particularly in realistic physiological or environmental models containing cells, proteins and solutes. Therefore, improved physicochemical nanomaterial assays are needed to provide accurate exposure risk assessments and genuine predictions of in vivo behavior and therapeutic value. Simpler model nanomaterial systems in buffer do not accurately duplicate this complexity or predict in vivo behavior. A diverse portfolio of complementary material characterization tools and bioassays are required to validate nanomaterial properties in physiology. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 456
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nanomaterial exposure, toxicity, and impact on human health
    Pietroiusti, Antonio
    Stockmann-Juvala, Helene
    Lucaroni, Francesca
    Savolainen, Kai
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-NANOMEDICINE AND NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 10 (05)
  • [22] Quality assurance for nanomaterial inhalation toxicity testing
    Lee, Sung Kwon
    Jo, Mi Seong
    Kim, Hoi Pin
    Kim, Jong Choon
    Yu, Il Je
    INHALATION TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 33 (05) : 161 - 167
  • [23] Challenges for assessing carbon nanomaterial toxicity to the skin
    Monteiro-Riviere, NA
    Inman, AO
    CARBON, 2006, 44 (06) : 1070 - 1078
  • [24] Developing a novel QSAR framework for nanomaterial toxicity
    Willighagen, Egon
    Karlsson, Hanna
    Grafstrom, Roland
    Fadeel, Bengt
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 211 : S62 - S63
  • [25] Epigenetic mechanisms in nanomaterial-induced toxicity
    Shyamasundar, Sukanya
    Ng, Cheng Teng
    Yung, Lin Yue Lanry
    Dheen, Shaikali Thameem
    Bay, Boon Huat
    EPIGENOMICS, 2015, 7 (03) : 395 - 411
  • [26] Autophagy as a Possible Underlying Mechanism of Nanomaterial Toxicity
    Cohignac, Vanessa
    Landry, Marion Julie
    Boczkowski, Jorge
    Lanone, Sophie
    NANOMATERIALS, 2014, 4 (03) : 548 - 582
  • [27] Dose-response analysis of nanomaterial toxicity
    Azizah, R. N.
    Verheyen, G.
    Van Miert, S.
    Shkedy, Z.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 368 : S198 - S198
  • [28] Machine Learning for Nanomaterial Toxicity Risk Assessment
    Gernand, Jeremy M.
    Casman, Elizabeth A.
    IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (03) : 84 - 88
  • [29] The Impact of Toxicity Testing Costs on Nanomaterial Regulation
    Choi, Jae-Young
    Ramachandran, Gurumurthy
    Kandlikar, Milind
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (09) : 3030 - 3034
  • [30] Effects of nanomaterial physicochemical properties on in vivo toxicity
    Aillon, Kristin L.
    Xie, Yumei
    El-Gendy, Nashwa
    Berkland, Cory J.
    Forrest, M. Laird
    ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 2009, 61 (06) : 457 - 466