Preoperative motor mapping by navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation improves outcome for motor eloquent lesions

被引:108
作者
Krieg, Sandro M. [1 ,2 ]
Sabih, Jamil [1 ,2 ]
Bulubasova, Lucia [1 ,2 ]
Obermueller, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Negwer, Chiara [1 ]
Janssen, Insa [1 ]
Shiban, Ehab [1 ]
Meyer, Bernhard [1 ]
Ringel, Florian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Neurosurg, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Neuroimaging Ctr, Klinikum Rechts Isar, D-81675 Munich, Germany
关键词
brain tumor; matched pair; preoperative mapping; rolandic region; transcranial magnetic stimulation; GRADE-II GLIOMAS; DIRECT CORTICAL STIMULATION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; SURGERY; CORTEX; RESECTION; PLASTICITY; LANGUAGE; AREAS;
D O I
10.1093/neuonc/nou007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has been proven to influence surgical indication and planning. Yet there is still no clear evidence how these additional preoperative functional data influence the clinical course and outcome. Thus, this study aimed to compare patients with motor eloquently located supratentorial lesions investigated with or without preoperative nTMS in terms of clinical outcome parameters. Methods. A prospectively enrolled cohort of 100 patients with supratentorial lesions located in motor eloquent areas was investigated by preoperative nTMS (2010-2013) and matched with a control of 100 patients who were operated on without nTMS data (2006-2010) by a matched pair analysis. Results. Patients in the nTMS group showed a significantly lower rate of residual tumor on postoperative MRI (OR 0.3828; 95% CI 0.2062-0.7107). Twelve percent of patients in the nTMS and 1% of patients in the non-nTMS group improved while 75% and 81% of the nTMS and non-nTMS groups, respectively, remained unchanged and 13% and 18% of patients in the nTMS and non-nTMS groups, respectively, deteriorated in postoperative motor function on long-term follow-up (P = .0057). Moreover, the nTMS group showed smaller craniotomies (nTMS 22.4 +/- 8.3 cm(2); non-nTMS 26.7 +/- 11.3 cm(2); P = .0023). Conclusions. This work increases the level of evidence for preoperative motor mapping by nTMS for rolandic lesions in a group comparison study. We therefore strongly advocate nTMS to become increasingly used for these lesions. However, a randomized trial on the comparison with the gold standard of intraoperative mapping seems mandatory.
引用
收藏
页码:1274 / 1282
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Associations between clinical outcome and tractography based on navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with language-eloquent brain lesions [J].
Sollmann, Nico ;
Fratini, Alessia ;
Zhang, Haosu ;
Zimmer, Claus ;
Meyer, Bernhard ;
Krieg, Sandro M. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 132 (04) :1033-1042
[22]   Preoperative multimodal motor mapping: a comparison of magnetoencephalography imaging, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, and direct cortical stimulation Clinical article [J].
Tarapore, Phiroz E. ;
Tate, Matthew C. ;
Findlay, Anne M. ;
Honma, Susanne M. ;
Mizuiri, Danielle ;
Berger, Mitchel S. ;
Nagarajan, Srikantan S. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 117 (02) :354-362
[23]   Evaluating postoperative motor function using postoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation motor mapping [J].
Eibl, Thomas ;
Liebert, Adrian ;
Ritter, Leonard ;
Schebesch, Karl-Michael .
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2025, 55 (04)
[24]   Reorganization of Motor Representations in Patients with Brain Lesions: A Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study [J].
Lucia Bulubas ;
Nico Sollmann ;
Noriko Tanigawa ;
Claus Zimmer ;
Bernhard Meyer ;
Sandro M. Krieg .
Brain Topography, 2018, 31 :288-299
[25]   Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for mapping the motor cortex in patients with rolandic brain tumors [J].
Takahashi, Satoshi ;
Vajkoczy, Peter ;
Picht, Thomas .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 34 (04)
[26]   Preoperative Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: New Insight for Brain Tumor-Related Language Mapping [J].
Natalizi, Federica ;
Piras, Federica ;
Vecchio, Daniela ;
Spalletta, Gianfranco ;
Piras, Fabrizio .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (10)
[27]   Mapping of the supplementary motor area using repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Kern, Giulia ;
Kempter, Miriam ;
Picht, Thomas ;
Engelhardt, Melina .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
[28]   Preoperative Functional Mapping for Rolandic Brain Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Direct Cortical Stimulation [J].
Picht, Thomas ;
Schmidt, Sein ;
Brandt, Stephan ;
Frey, Dietmar ;
Hannula, Henri ;
Neuvonen, Tuomas ;
Karhu, Jari ;
Vajkoczy, Peter ;
Suess, Olaf .
NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 69 (03) :581-588
[29]   Resection of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Positive Prerolandic Motor Areas Causes Permanent Impairment of Motor Function [J].
Moser, Tobias ;
Bulubas, Lucia ;
Sabih, Jamil ;
Conway, Neal ;
Wildschutz, Noemie ;
Sollmann, Nico ;
Meyer, Bernhard ;
Ringel, Florian ;
Krieg, Sandro M. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 81 (01) :99-109
[30]   Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials [J].
Julkunen, Petro ;
Saisanen, Laura ;
Danner, Nils ;
Niskanen, Eini ;
Hukkanen, Taina ;
Mervaala, Esa ;
Kononen, Mervi .
NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 44 (03) :790-795