Toward improved calibration of watershed models: Multisite multiobjective measures of information

被引:43
作者
Ahmadi, Mehdi [1 ]
Arabi, Mazdak [2 ]
Ascough, James C., II [3 ]
Fontane, Darrell G. [2 ]
Engel, Bernard A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Spatial Sci Lab, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] USDA ARS, ASRU, 2150 Ctr Ave,Bldg D,Suite 200, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[4] Purdue Univ, Dep Agr & Biol Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Parameter estimation; Hydrologic modeling; Optimization; SWAT model; Water quality; FORECASTING UNCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; HYDROLOGIC-MODELS; IMPACT; OPTIMIZATION; EQUIFINALITY; INCOHERENCE; ALGORITHMS; MULTIPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.012
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper presents a computational framework for incorporation of disparate information from observed hydrologic responses at multiple locations into the calibration of watershed models. The framework consists of three components: 1) an a-priori characterization of system behavior; 2) a formal and statistically valid formulation of objective function(s) of model errors; and 3) an optimization engine to determine the Pareto-optimal front for the selected objectives. The proposed framework was applied for calibration of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in the Eagle Creek Watershed, Indiana, USA using three single objective optimization methods [Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE), Dynamically Dimensioned Search (DDS), and DiffeRential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis (DREAM)I, and one multi-objective optimization method. Solutions were classified into behavioral and non-behavioral using percent bias and Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient. The results showed that aggregation of streamflow and NOx (NO3-N + NO2-N) information measured at multiple locations within the watershed into a single measure of weighted errors resulted in faster convergence to a solution with a lower overall objective function value than using multiple measures of information. However, the DREAM method solution was the only one among the three single objective optimization methods considered in this study that satisfied the conditions defined for characterizing system behavior. In particular, aggregation of streamflow and NOx responses undermined finding "very good" behavioral solutions for NOx, primarily because of the significantly larger number of observations for streamflow. Aggregation of only NOx responses into a single measure expedited finding better solutions although aggregation of data from nested sites appeared to be inappropriate because of correlated errors. This study demonstrates the importance of hydrologic and water quality data availability at multiple locations, and also highlights the use of multiobjective approaches for proper calibration of watershed models that are used for pollutant source identification and watershed management. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 145
页数:11
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Multisite-multivariable sensitivity analysis of distributed watershed models: Enhancing the perceptions from computationally frugal methods [J].
Ahmadi, Mehdi ;
Ascough, James C., II ;
DeJonge, Kendall C. ;
Arabi, Mazdak .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2014, 279 :54-67
[2]   Impact of climate change on diffuse pollutant fluxes at the watershed scale [J].
Ahmadi, Mehdi ;
Records, Rosemary ;
Arabi, Mazdak .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2014, 28 (04) :1962-1972
[3]   An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction [J].
Ajami, Newsha K. ;
Duan, Qingyun ;
Sorooshian, Soroosh .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (01)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V119, P429
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1953, Arkiv for Matematik, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02590998
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, P 4 ANN C GENETIC EV
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1 ARC 2 DIG EL MOD
[8]  
Arnold J.G., 2011, SOIL WATER ASSESSMEN
[9]   Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Srinivasan, R ;
Muttiah, RS ;
Williams, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01) :73-89
[10]   Characterising performance of environmental models [J].
Bennett, Neil D. ;
Croke, Barry F. W. ;
Guariso, Giorgio ;
Guillaume, Joseph H. A. ;
Hamilton, Serena H. ;
Jakeman, Anthony J. ;
Marsili-Libelli, Stefano ;
Newham, Lachlan T. H. ;
Norton, John P. ;
Perrin, Charles ;
Pierce, Suzanne A. ;
Robson, Barbara ;
Seppelt, Ralf ;
Voinov, Alexey A. ;
Fath, Brian D. ;
Andreassian, Vazken .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2013, 40 :1-20