Using social network and stakeholder analysis to help evaluate infectious waste management: A step towards a holistic assessment

被引:77
作者
Caniato, Marco [1 ]
Vaccari, Mentore [1 ]
Visvanathan, Chettiyappan [2 ]
Zurbrugg, Christian [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brescia, Res Ctr Appropriate Technol Environm Management D, I-25123 Brescia, Italy
[2] Asian Inst Technol, SERD, Klongluang 12120, Pathumthani, Thailand
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci & Technol, Dept Water & Sanitat Developing Countries Sandec, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
关键词
Infectious waste; Social network analysis; Stakeholder analysis; Holistic system assessment; Non-technical aspects; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; PREFERENCES; ENVIRONMENT; COUNTRIES; SUSTAINABILITY; INVOLVEMENT; PROJECT; SITES; MODEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of a solid waste management scheme requires an accurate analysis and integration of several determining features. In addition to the technical aspects, any such system shows a complex interaction of actors with varying stakes, decision-making power and influence, as well as a favourable or disabling environment. When capitalizing on the knowledge and experience from a specific case, it is also crucial that experts do not "forget" or underestimate the importance of such social determinants and that they are familiar with the methods and tools to assess them. Social network analysis (SNA) and stakeholder analysis (SA) methods can be successfully applied to better understand actors' role and actions, analyse driving forces and existing coordination among stakeholders, as well as identify bottlenecks in communication which affect daily operations or strategic planning for the future way forward. SNA and SA, appropriately adjusted for a certain system, can provide a useful integration to methods by assessing other aspects to ensure a comprehensive picture of the situation. This paper describes how to integrate SNA and SA in order to survey a solid waste management system. This paper presents the results of an analysis of On-Nuch infectious waste incinerator in Bangkok, Thailand. Stakeholders were interviewed and asked to prioritize characteristics and relationships which they consider particularly important for system development and success of the scheme. In such a way, a large quantity of information about organization, communication between stakeholders and their perception about operation, environmental and health impact, and potential alternatives for the system was collected in a systematic way. The survey results suggest that stakeholders are generally satisfied with the system operation, though communication should be improved. Moreover, stakeholders should be strategically more involved in system development planning, according to their characteristics, to prevent negative reactions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:938 / 951
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] *3R KNOWL HUB, 2008, HEALTHC WAST AS I IN
  • [2] Healthcare waste management in Asia
    Ananth, A. Prem
    Prashanthini, V.
    Visvanathan, C.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (01) : 154 - 161
  • [3] Method Development for Identifying and Analysing Stakeholders in Climate Change Adaptation Processes
    Andre, Karin
    Simonsson, Louise
    Swartling, Asa Gerger
    Linner, Bjorn-Ola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2012, 14 (03) : 243 - 261
  • [4] Choosing a municipal landfill site by analytic network process
    Banar, Mufide
    Kose, Barbaros Murat
    Ozkan, Aysun
    Acar, Ilgin Poyraz
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2007, 52 (04): : 747 - 751
  • [5] Governance of environmental risk: New approaches to managing stakeholder involvement
    Benn, Suzanne
    Dunphy, Dexter
    Martin, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (04) : 1567 - 1575
  • [6] Borgatti S. P., 2002, Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis (Version 6), DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1439-0310.2009.01613.X, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01613.x]
  • [7] Bryson J. M., 2004, Public Manag. Rev., V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1080/14719030410001675722
  • [8] Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit
    Bryson, John M.
    Patton, Michael Quinn
    Bowman, Ruth A.
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2011, 34 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [9] Techno-economic evaluation for the improvement of MSW collection in Somaliland and Puntland
    Collivignarelli, Carlo
    Vaccari, Mentore
    Di Bella, Veronica
    Giardina, Daniela
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2011, 29 (05) : 521 - 531
  • [10] Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA
    Contreras, Francisco
    Hanaki, Keisuke
    Aramaki, Toshiya
    Connors, Stephen
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2008, 52 (07) : 979 - 991