What is the effect of LiDAR-derived DEM resolution on large-scale watershed model results?

被引:77
作者
Yang, Ping [1 ]
Ames, Daniel P. [2 ]
Fonseca, Andre [3 ]
Anderson, Danny [4 ]
Shrestha, Rupesh [5 ]
Glenn, Nancy F. [5 ]
Cao, Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] Tarleton State Univ, Texas Inst Appl Environm Res, Stephenville, TX 76401 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[3] Univ Porto, Dept Chem Engn, LSRE LCM, P-4100 Oporto, Portugal
[4] Idaho Natl Lab, Idaho Falls, ID USA
[5] Boise State Univ, Dept Geosci, Boise, ID 83725 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Hydrographic feature extraction; Hydrologic modeling; Stream networks; LiDAR; Digital elevation model; Terrain analysis; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; HYDROLOGICAL-SIMULATION; DELINEATION; EXTRACTION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.04.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper examines the effect of raster cell size on hydrographic feature extraction and hydrological modeling using LiDAR derived DEMs. LiDAR datasets for three experimental watersheds were converted to DEMs at various cell sizes. Watershed boundaries and stream networks were delineated from each DEM and were compared to reference data. Hydrological simulations were conducted and the outputs were compared. Smaller cell size DEMs consistently resulted in less difference between DEM-delineated features and reference data. However, minor differences been found between streamflow simulations resulted for a lumped watershed model run at daily simulations aggregated at an annual average. These findings indicate that while higher resolution DEM grids may result in more accurate representation of terrain characteristics, such variations do not necessarily improve watershed scale simulation modeling. Hence the additional expense of generating high resolution DEM's for the purpose of watershed modeling at daily or longer time steps may not be warranted. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 57
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Agarwal P.K., 2006, PROGR SPATIAL DATA H, P771
[2]  
Aishlin P., 2007, THESIS BOISE STATE U
[3]   Hydrological modeling of Zarqa River Basin - Jordan using the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF) model [J].
Al-Abed, Nassim ;
Al-Sharif, Munjed .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2008, 22 (09) :1203-1220
[4]   HydroDesktop: Web services-based software for hydrologic data discovery, download, visualization, and analysis [J].
Ames, Daniel P. ;
Horsburgh, Jeffery S. ;
Cao, Yang ;
Kadlec, Jiri ;
Whiteaker, Timothy ;
Valentine, David .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2012, 37 :146-156
[5]  
Anderson D. L., 2014, Journal of Geographic Information System, V6, P88, DOI 10.4236/jgis.2014.62010
[6]   Characterising performance of environmental models [J].
Bennett, Neil D. ;
Croke, Barry F. W. ;
Guariso, Giorgio ;
Guillaume, Joseph H. A. ;
Hamilton, Serena H. ;
Jakeman, Anthony J. ;
Marsili-Libelli, Stefano ;
Newham, Lachlan T. H. ;
Norton, John P. ;
Perrin, Charles ;
Pierce, Suzanne A. ;
Robson, Barbara ;
Seppelt, Ralf ;
Voinov, Alexey A. ;
Fath, Brian D. ;
Andreassian, Vazken .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2013, 40 :1-20
[7]  
Beven K.J., 1979, Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, V24, P43, DOI DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834
[8]  
Bicknell B.R., 2005, Hydrological Simulation Program - Fortran (HSPF Ver.12.2) User's Manual
[9]   How does modifying a DEM to reflect known hydrology affect subsequent terrain analysis? [J].
Callow, John Nikolaus ;
Van Niel, Kimberly P. ;
Boggs, Guy S. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 332 (1-2) :30-39
[10]   Assessing resolution and source effects of digital elevation models on automated floodplain delineation: A case study from the Camp Creek Watershed, Missouri [J].
Charrier, Richard ;
Li, Yingkui .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 34 :38-46