Centrifuge Modeling Studies of Site Response in Soft Clay over Wide Strain Range

被引:55
作者
Afacan, Kamil B. [1 ]
Brandenberg, Scott J. [1 ]
Stewart, Jonathan P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ground motion; Centrifuge models; Clays; Shear strength; Shear modulus; Shear waves; Nonlinear response; AMPLIFICATION; SAND;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001014
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Centrifuge models of soft-clay deposits were shaken with suites of earthquake ground motions to study site response over a wide strain range. The models were constructed in an innovative hinged-plate container to effectively reproduce one-dimensional ground-response boundary conditions. Dense sensor arrays facilitate back-calculation of modulus-reduction and damping values that show modest misfits from empirical models. Low-amplitude base motions produced nearly elastic response in which ground motions were amplified through the soil column, and the fundamental site period was approximately 1.0 s. High-intensity base motions produced shear strains higher than 10%, mobilizing shear failure in clay at stresses larger than the undrained monotonic shear strength. The authors attribute these high mobilized stresses to rate effects, which should be considered in strength-parameter selection for nonlinear analysis. This nonlinear response deamplified short-period spectral accelerations and lengthened the site period to 3.0 s. The nonlinearity in spectral amplification is parameterized in a form used for site terms in ground-motion prediction equations to provide empirical constraint unavailable from ground-motion databases.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Afacan K. B., 2011, EVALUATION NONLINEAR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, D2487 ASTM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Soils and Waves: Particulate Materials Behavior, Characterization, and Process Monitoring, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02987719
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1972, Geotech. Spec. Publ, DOI DOI 10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001760
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, P INT WORKSH UNC NON
[6]   Uncertainty and bias in ground-motion estimates from ground response analyses [J].
Baturay, MB ;
Stewart, JP .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 93 (05) :2025-2042
[7]   Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s [J].
Boore, David M. ;
Atkinson, Gail M. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2008, 24 (01) :99-138
[8]   Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences [J].
Boore, DM ;
Bommer, JJ .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2005, 25 (02) :93-115
[9]  
Borcherdt RD., 1994, Earthq Spectra, V10, P617, DOI DOI 10.1193/1.1585791
[10]   Fast stacking and phase corrections of shear wave signals in a noisy environment [J].
Brandenberg, Scott J. ;
Kutter, Bruce L. ;
Wilson, Daniel W. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (08) :1154-1165