Visualizing the flow of evidence in network meta-analysis and characterizing mixed treatment comparisons

被引:131
作者
Koenig, Jochem [1 ]
Krahn, Ulrike [1 ]
Binder, Harald [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Med Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Univ Med Ctr, D-55122 Mainz, Germany
关键词
network meta-analysis; mixed treatment comparison; hat matrix; INCONSISTENCY; CONSISTENCY;
D O I
10.1002/sim.6001
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Network meta-analysis techniques allow for pooling evidence from different studies with only partially overlapping designs for getting a broader basis for decision support. The results are network-based effect estimates that take indirect evidence into account for all pairs of treatments. The results critically depend on homogeneity and consistency assumptions, which are sometimes difficult to investigate. To support such evaluation, we propose a display of the flow of evidence and introduce new measures that characterize the structure of a mixed treatment comparison. Specifically, a linear fixed effects model for network meta-analysis is considered, where the network estimates for two treatments are linear combinations of direct effect estimates comparing these or other treatments. The linear coefficients can be seen as the generalization of weights known from classical meta-analysis. We summarize properties of these coefficients and display them as a weighted directed acyclic graph, representing the flow of evidence. Furthermore, measures are introduced that quantify the direct evidence proportion, the mean path length, and the minimal parallelism of mixed treatment comparisons. The graphical display and the measures are illustrated for two published network meta-analyses. In these applications, the proposed methods are seen to render transparent the process of data pooling in mixed treatment comparisons. They can be expected to be more generally useful for guiding and facilitating the validity assessment in network meta-analysis. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:5414 / 5429
页数:16
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Aitken AC., 1936, P ROYAL SOC EDINBURG, V55, P42, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S0370164600014346, 10.1017/S0370164600014346]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, NICE DSU technical support document 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomised controlled trials
  • [3] [Anonymous], 4 NICE DSU
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, Regression Diagnostics
  • [5] Network Analysis in the Social Sciences
    Borgatti, Stephen P.
    Mehra, Ajay
    Brass, Daniel J.
    Labianca, Giuseppe
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 323 (5916) : 892 - 895
  • [6] Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis
    Cipriani, Andrea
    Furukawa, Toshiaki A.
    Salanti, Georgia
    Geddes, John R.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Churchill, Rachel
    Watanabe, Norio
    Nakagawa, Atsuo
    Omori, Ichiro M.
    McGuire, Hugh
    Tansella, Michele
    Barbui, Corrado
    [J]. LANCET, 2009, 373 (9665) : 746 - 758
  • [7] Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
    Dias, S.
    Welton, N. J.
    Caldwell, D. M.
    Ades, A. E.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (7-8) : 932 - 944
  • [8] Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality
    Donegan, Sarah
    Williamson, Paula
    Gamble, Carrol
    Tudur-Smith, Catrin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (11):
  • [9] DORFMAN AH, 1991, J ROY STAT SOC B, V53, P441
  • [10] Meta-analysis of multitreatment studies
    Hasselblad, V
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (01) : 37 - 43