Characterization of implant displacement and deformation in gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy

被引:21
作者
Damato, Antonio L.
Cormack, Robert A.
Viswanathan, Akila N.
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Brachytherapy; Gynecologic; Interstitial; Displacement; Uncertainty; Catheter; DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY; PROSTATE-CANCER; CATHETER MOVEMENT; HDR BRACHYTHERAPY; MALIGNANCIES; FRACTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2013.09.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the uncertainties in implant position during multifraction gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy, we analyzed the interfraction displacements and deformations of gynecologic interstitial implants. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fourteen gynecologic patients treated with multifraction high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy received two CT scans each at the time of implantation and 48-72 h later. Rigid fusions on the pubic symphysis were performed. This analysis included catheter shifts in the cranial (CR), caudal (CA), anterior, posterior, left, and right directions; template shifts; the change in the catheter length measured along the path from catheter tip to catheter connector (offset); the change in relative distances between catheters (deformations); and changes in rectum and bladder D-2cc and tumor D-90. RESULTS: Of the 198 catheters analyzed, the number of catheter shifts (%) and mean +/- standard deviation were 43% CA (5.0 +/- 2.0 mm), 22% CR (7.9 +/- 4.0 mm), 14% anterior (6.3 +/- 2.1 mm), 48% posterior (8.7 +/- 3.1 mm), 7% left (4.8 +/- 0.4 mm), and 9% right (5.4 +/- 0.9 mm). Catheter offsets were 3% CA (7.2 +/- 6.3 mm) and 11% CR (6.1 +/- 2.6 mm). Template shifts were 43% CA (5.2 +/- 1.6 mm) and 14% CR (6.6 +/- 4.0 mm). Deformations were 10 shrinkages (4.7 +/- 0.9 mm) and 32 expansions (4.7 +/- 0.5 mm). Dosimetric changes were 5.2% +/- 10.8% for rectum D-2cc -1.1% +/- 18.5% for bladder D-2cc, and -5.1% +/- 6.7% for tumor D-90. CONCLUSIONS: On average, less than 1 cm displacements and deformations of the implant occurred over the course of treatment. Proper quality assurance methodologies should be in place to detect shifts that can potentially result in inadvertent insertion into normal tissue. (C) 2014 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 109
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Abbe R, 1913, LANCET, V2, P524
[2]   Needle displacement during HDR brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer [J].
Damore, SJ ;
Syed, AMN ;
Puthawala, AA ;
Sharma, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (05) :1205-1211
[3]  
Erickson B, 1997, J SURG ONCOL, V66, P285, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199712)66:4<285::AID-JSO14>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-T
[5]   CT-guided interstitial implantation of gynecologic malignancies [J].
Erickson, B ;
Albano, K ;
Gillin, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 36 (03) :699-709
[6]  
FLEMING P, 1980, OBSTET GYNECOL, V55, P525
[7]   DOSIMETRIC IMPACT OF INTERFRACTION CATHETER MOVEMENT IN HIGH-DOSE RATE PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY [J].
Foster, William ;
Cunha, J. Adam M. ;
Hsu, I-Chow ;
Weinberg, Vivan ;
Krishnamurthy, Devan ;
Pouliot, Jean .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (01) :85-90
[8]   High dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for prostate cancer: catheter and gland movement between fractions [J].
Hoskin, PJ ;
Bownes, PJ ;
Ostler, P ;
Walker, K ;
Bryant, L .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 68 (03) :285-288
[9]   HDR monotherapy for prostate cancer: A simulation study to determine the effect of catheter displacement on target coverage and normal tissue irradiation [J].
Kolkman-Deurloo, Inger-Karine K. ;
Roos, Martin A. ;
Aluwini, Shafak .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 (02) :192-197
[10]   A MULTIPLE-SITE PERINEAL APPLICATOR (MUPIT) FOR TREATMENT OF PROSTATIC, ANORECTAL, AND GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES [J].
MARTINEZ, A ;
COX, RS ;
EDMUNDSON, GK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1984, 10 (02) :297-305