Asymmetrical change in the pelvis and the spine during cross-legged sitting postures

被引:9
作者
Ahn, Soonjae [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Seunghyeon [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Sunyoung [3 ]
Jeon, Hyeseon [3 ]
Kim, Youngho [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Wonju 220710, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Inst Med Engn, Wonju 220710, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Dept Rehabil Therapy, Wonju 220710, South Korea
关键词
Cross-legged sitting; Low back pain; Motion analysis; Asymmetry; HEALTHY-YOUNG; KINEMATICS; STABILITY; OFFICE; JOINT;
D O I
10.1007/s12206-013-0865-5
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
People spend much time with cross-legged sitting by increasing the time spent in the chair. Prolonged cross-legged sitting postures might cause spinal disorders and trunk asymmetry problems. We investigated the biomechanical effects of cross-legged sitting postures on the pelvic and spinal regions. 3D-motion analyses were performed on 26 healthy subjects. Data were collected while the subjects sat in four different postures: the control posture (without crossed legs) of sitting upright on the chair; the knee-on-knee (KoK) posture (the right knee on the left knee), the ankle-on-knee (AoK) posture (the right ankle on the left knee) and the ankle-on-ankle (AoA) posture (the right ankle on the left ankle). EMG signals were also collected for abdominal muscles. Cross-legged sitting postures showed significantly greater kyphotic curves in the lumbar and the thoracic spines and pelvic posterior tilting, when compared with the control posture. The pressure on the right buttock area was greater in the AoK posture than in the control posture, and the pressure on the left buttock area in the KoK posture was greater than in the control posture. Cross-legged sitting postures showed significantly greater external oblique muscle activation when compared with the control posture.
引用
收藏
页码:3427 / 3432
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ANDERSSON BJG, 1975, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V6, P105
[2]  
Andersson G. B., 1997, ADULT SPINE PRINCIPL, V1, P93
[3]   Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain [J].
Andersson, GBJ .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9178) :581-585
[4]   SEX-DIFFERENCES IN THE SKELETAL GEOMETRY OF THE HUMAN PELVIS AND HIP-JOINT [J].
BRINCKMANN, P ;
HOEFERT, H ;
JONGEN, HT .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1981, 14 (06) :427-430
[5]  
Caillet R., 1988, LOW BACK PAIN SYNDRO
[6]   Low back joint loading and kinematics during standing and unsupported sitting [J].
Callaghan, JP ;
McGill, SM .
ERGONOMICS, 2001, 44 (03) :280-294
[7]   RELATIONSHIP OF SPINE DEFORMITY AND PELVIC OBLIQUITY ON SITTING PRESSURE DISTRIBUTIONS AND DECUBITUS ULCERATION [J].
DRUMMOND, D ;
BREED, AL ;
NARECHANIA, R .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 1985, 5 (04) :396-402
[8]   ANTHROPOMETRIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN SCHOOL, OFFICE AND FACTORY SEATING [J].
FLOYD, WF ;
WARD, JS .
ERGONOMICS, 1969, 12 (02) :132-&
[9]   The effects of abdominal muscle coactivation on lumbar spine stability [J].
Gardner-Morse, MG ;
Stokes, IAF .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (01) :86-91
[10]   Cost-benefit of muscle cocontraction in protecting against spinal instability [J].
Granata, KP ;
Marras, WS .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1398-1404