A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyography Amplitude in the Parallel, Full, and Front Squat Variations in Resistance-Trained Females

被引:52
作者
Contreras, Bret [1 ]
Vigotsky, Andrew D. [2 ]
Schoenfeld, Brad J. [3 ]
Beardsley, Chris [4 ]
Cronin, John [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Sport Performance Res Inst, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Arizona State Univ, Kinesiol Program, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] CUNY Lehman Coll, Dept Hlth Sci, Bronx, NY USA
[4] Strength & Conditioning Res Ltd, London, England
[5] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Exercise Biomed & Hlth Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
relative loading; electromyography; lower extremity; resistance training; exercise; CLOSED KINETIC CHAIN; TIBIOFEMORAL JOINT FORCES; BACK SQUAT; MUSCLE-ACTIVITY; SPRINT PERFORMANCE; HEAVY-LOAD; BARBELL SQUAT; STANCE WIDTH; KNEE-JOINT; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1123/jab.2015-0113
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Front, full, and parallel squats are some of the most popular squat variations. The purpose of this investigation was to compare mean and peak electromyography (EMG) amplitude of the upper gluteus maximus, lower gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, and vastus lateralis of front, full, and parallel squats. Thirteen healthy women (age = 28.9 +/- 5.1 y; height = 164 +/- 6.3 cm; body mass = 58.2 +/- 6.4 kg) performed 10 repetitions of their estimated 10-repetition maximum of each respective variation. There were no statistical (P <= .05) differences between full, front, and parallel squats in any of the tested muscles. Given these findings, it can be concluded that the front, full, or parallel squat can be performed for similar EMG amplitudes. However, given the results of previous research, it is recommended that individuals use a full range of motion when squatting, assuming full range can be safely achieved, to promote more favorable training adaptations. Furthermore, despite requiring lighter loads, the front squat may provide a similar training stimulus to the back squat.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 22
页数:7
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC AND KINETIC COMPARISON OF THE BACK SQUAT AND OVERHEAD SQUAT [J].
Aspe, Rodrigo R. ;
Swinton, Paul A. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2014, 28 (10) :2827-2836
[2]  
Baechle TR., 2008, National Strength and Conditioning Association. Essentials of strength training and conditioning, V3rd
[3]   Effect of range of motion in heavy load squatting on muscle and tendon adaptations [J].
Bloomquist, K. ;
Langberg, H. ;
Karlsen, S. ;
Madsgaard, S. ;
Boesen, M. ;
Raastad, T. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 113 (08) :2133-2142
[4]  
Boren K, 2011, INT J SPORTS PHYS TH, V6, P206
[5]  
Braidot A. A., 2007, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V90, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/90/1/012009
[6]   Quadriceps effort during squat exercise depends on hip extensor muscle strategy [J].
Bryanton, Megan A. ;
Carey, Jason P. ;
Kennedy, Michael D. ;
Chiu, Loren Z. F. .
SPORTS BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 14 (01) :122-138
[7]   EFFECT OF SQUAT DEPTH AND BARBELL LOAD ON RELATIVE MUSCULAR EFFORT IN SQUATTING [J].
Bryanton, Megan A. ;
Kennedy, Michael D. ;
Carey, Jason P. ;
Chiu, Loren Z. F. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2012, 26 (10) :2820-2828
[8]  
Caterisano A, 2002, J STRENGTH COND RES, V16, P428
[9]   RELATIONSHIPS OF PEAK LEG POWER, 1 MAXIMAL REPETITION HALF BACK SQUAT, AND LEG MUSCLE VOLUME TO 5-M SPRINT PERFORMANCE OF JUNIOR SOCCER PLAYERS [J].
Chelly, Mohamed Souhaiel ;
Cherif, Najet ;
Ben Amar, Mohamed ;
Hermassi, Souhail ;
Fathloun, Mourad ;
Bouhlel, Ezdine ;
Tabka, Zouhair ;
Shephard, Roy J. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2010, 24 (01) :266-271
[10]   MUSCLE ACTIVATION IN THE LOADED FREE BARBELL SQUAT: A BRIEF REVIEW [J].
Clark, Dave R. ;
Lambert, Mike I. ;
Hunter, Angus M. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2012, 26 (04) :1169-1178