Beam-Column Joints Reinforcement Detailing Adequacy in Case of a Corner Column Loss-Numerical Analysis

被引:7
作者
Abdelwahed, B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
来源
LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES | 2019年 / 16卷 / 07期
关键词
RC joint; Progressive collapse; Flexural resistance; Numerical simulation; Reinforcement details; Macro model; SUBASSEMBLAGES;
D O I
10.1590/1679-78255536
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study investigates the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beam-column joints at the corner panel after a ground corner column loss scenario. The ductility of a frame is dependent on the ductility of its components, particularly its joints. Deficiency in joints performance can be related to an unexpected event. For example, the removal of a ground corner column turns the joint above into an inverted knee joint, and also inverses the direction of the resulted bending moments in the adjacent exterior and interior joints. Throughout this work, the effects of these changes are evaluated numerically using different modeling techniques considering both seismic and non-seismic reinforcement details. Numerical simulations of standard and sub-standard joints that were verified against experimentally tested joints are also presented. Joint macro models are developed using the OpenSees platform. These numerical models are then used to simulate the substandard beam-column joints appearing in RC frames after ground corner column removal. Moreover, strut and tie models (STMs) were developed for a substandard knee joint to validate the obtained numerical results. The application of the developed numerical models allows to identify the evolution of a joint's capacity in function of its reinforcement detailing. The analysis shows the suitability of seismic detailing for exterior and interior joints and also a decrease in the inverted knee joint resistance and this can be recovered by adding i) more confinement to the joint panel zone or ii) joint vertical stirrups. An increase in the degree of confidence in the numerical results is achieved by reproduce similar behavior using different analysis methods.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08)
  • [2] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, KEYW US MAN VOL 2 MA
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, OPEN SYSTEM EARTHQUA
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, CEB FIP MOD COD
  • [6] Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Assemblies under Column-Removal Scenario
    Bao, Yihai
    Lew, H. S.
    Kunnath, Sashi K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 140 (01)
  • [7] Basem A., 2018, LATIN AM J SOLIDS ST, V15
  • [8] BROWN MD, 2006, 043712 U TEX CTR TRA
  • [9] Modeling beam-column joints in fragility assessment of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames
    Celik, Ozan Cem
    Ellingwood, Bruce R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2008, 12 (03) : 357 - 381
  • [10] European Commitee for Standardization, 2004, Eurocode 5: Design of Timber Structures - Part 1-1: General - Common Rules and Rules for Buildings Eurocode