Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response

被引:53
作者
Albizu, Alejandro [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Ruogu [1 ,3 ]
Indahlastari, Aprinda [1 ,4 ]
O'Shea, Andrew [1 ,4 ]
Stolte, Skylar E. [3 ]
See, Kyle B. [3 ]
Boutzoukas, Emanuel M. [1 ,4 ]
Kraft, Jessica N. [1 ,2 ]
Nissim, Nicole R. [1 ,2 ]
Woods, Adam J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Ctr Cognit Aging & Memory, McKnight Brain Inst, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Neurosci, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Univ Florida, J Crayton Pruitt Family Dept Biomed Engn, Herbert Wertheim Coll Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Gainesville, FL USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; Cognitive aging; Finite element modeling; Machine learning; Treatment response;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely investigated as a therapeutic tool to enhance cognitive function in older adults with and without neurodegenerative disease. Prior research demonstrates that electric current delivery to the brain can vary significantly across individuals. Quantification of this variability could enable person-specific optimization of tDCS outcomes. This pilot study used machine learning and MRI-derived electric field models to predict working memory improvements as a proof of concept for precision cognitive intervention. Methods: Fourteen healthy older adults received 20 minutes of 2 mA tDCS stimulation (F3/F4) during a two-week cognitive training intervention. Participants performed an N-back working memory task pre-/ post-intervention. MRI-derived current models were passed through a linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) learning algorithm to characterize crucial tDCS current components (intensity and direction) that induced working memory improvements in tDCS responders versus non-responders. Main results: SVM models of tDCS current components had 86% overall accuracy in classifying treatment responders vs. non-responders, with current intensity producing the best overall model differentiating changes in working memory performance. Median current intensity and direction in brain regions near the electrodes were positively related to intervention responses (r = 0.811, p < 0.001 and r = 0.774, p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study provides the first evidence that pattern recognition analyses of MRI-derived tDCS current models can provide individual prognostic classification of tDCS treatment response with 86% accuracy. Individual differences in current intensity and direction play important roles in determining treatment response to tDCS. These findings provide important insights into mechanisms of tDCS response as well as proof of concept for future precision dosing models of tDCS intervention. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1753 / 1764
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
[41]  
Kazemi K, 2014, J BIOMED PHYS ENG
[42]   Dosage Considerations for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children: A Computational Modeling Study [J].
Kessler, Sudha Kilaru ;
Minhas, Preet ;
Woods, Adam J. ;
Rosen, Alyssa ;
Gorman, Casey ;
Bikson, Marom .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09)
[43]   Direct current stimulation boosts hebbian plasticity in vitro [J].
Kronberg, Greg ;
Rahman, Asif ;
Sharma, Mahima ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Parra, Lucas C. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (02) :287-301
[44]   Direct Current Stimulation Modulates LTP and LTD: Activity Dependence and Dendritic Effects [J].
Kronberg, Greg ;
Bridi, Morgan ;
Abel, Ted ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Parra, Lucas C. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2017, 10 (01) :51-58
[45]   Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS [J].
Laakso, Ilkka ;
Tanaka, Satoshi ;
Koyama, Soichiro ;
De Santis, Valerio ;
Hirata, Akimasa .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (05) :906-913
[46]   Global signal regression strengthens association between resting-state functional connectivity and behavior [J].
Li, Jingwei ;
Kong, Ru ;
Liegeois, Raphael ;
Orban, Csaba ;
Tan, Yanrui ;
Sun, Nanbo ;
Holmes, Avram J. ;
Sabuncu, Mert R. ;
Ge, Tian ;
Yeo, B. T. Thomas .
NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 196 :126-141
[47]   The first step for neuroimaging data analysis: DICOM to NIfTI conversion [J].
Li, Xiangrui ;
Morgan, Paul S. ;
Ashburner, John ;
Smith, Jolinda ;
Rorden, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2016, 264 :47-56
[48]   Group-regularized individual prediction: theory and application to pain [J].
Lindquist, Martin A. ;
Krishnan, Anjali ;
Lopez-Sola, Marina ;
Jepma, Marieke ;
Woo, Choong-Wan ;
Koban, Leonie ;
Roy, Mathieu ;
Atlas, Lauren Y. ;
Schmidt, Liane ;
Chang, Luke J. ;
Losin, Elizabeth A. Reynolds ;
Eisenbarth, Hedwig ;
Ashar, Yoni K. ;
Delk, Elizabeth ;
Wager, Tor D. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 145 :274-287
[49]   Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates synaptic mechanisms involved in associative learning in behaving rabbits [J].
Marquez-Ruiz, Javier ;
Leal-Campanario, Rocio ;
Sanchez-Campusano, Raudel ;
Molaee-Ardekani, Behnam ;
Wendling, Fabrice ;
Miranda, Pedro C. ;
Ruffini, Giulio ;
Gruart, Agnes ;
Maria Delgado-Garcia, Jose .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (17) :6710-6715
[50]   THE KOLMOGOROV-SMIRNOV TEST FOR GOODNESS OF FIT [J].
MASSEY, FJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1951, 46 (253) :68-78