Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response

被引:50
作者
Albizu, Alejandro [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Ruogu [1 ,3 ]
Indahlastari, Aprinda [1 ,4 ]
O'Shea, Andrew [1 ,4 ]
Stolte, Skylar E. [3 ]
See, Kyle B. [3 ]
Boutzoukas, Emanuel M. [1 ,4 ]
Kraft, Jessica N. [1 ,2 ]
Nissim, Nicole R. [1 ,2 ]
Woods, Adam J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Ctr Cognit Aging & Memory, McKnight Brain Inst, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Neurosci, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Univ Florida, J Crayton Pruitt Family Dept Biomed Engn, Herbert Wertheim Coll Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Gainesville, FL USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; Cognitive aging; Finite element modeling; Machine learning; Treatment response;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely investigated as a therapeutic tool to enhance cognitive function in older adults with and without neurodegenerative disease. Prior research demonstrates that electric current delivery to the brain can vary significantly across individuals. Quantification of this variability could enable person-specific optimization of tDCS outcomes. This pilot study used machine learning and MRI-derived electric field models to predict working memory improvements as a proof of concept for precision cognitive intervention. Methods: Fourteen healthy older adults received 20 minutes of 2 mA tDCS stimulation (F3/F4) during a two-week cognitive training intervention. Participants performed an N-back working memory task pre-/ post-intervention. MRI-derived current models were passed through a linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) learning algorithm to characterize crucial tDCS current components (intensity and direction) that induced working memory improvements in tDCS responders versus non-responders. Main results: SVM models of tDCS current components had 86% overall accuracy in classifying treatment responders vs. non-responders, with current intensity producing the best overall model differentiating changes in working memory performance. Median current intensity and direction in brain regions near the electrodes were positively related to intervention responses (r = 0.811, p < 0.001 and r = 0.774, p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study provides the first evidence that pattern recognition analyses of MRI-derived tDCS current models can provide individual prognostic classification of tDCS treatment response with 86% accuracy. Individual differences in current intensity and direction play important roles in determining treatment response to tDCS. These findings provide important insights into mechanisms of tDCS response as well as proof of concept for future precision dosing models of tDCS intervention. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1753 / 1764
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [41] Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy
    Kasinadhuni, A. K.
    Indahlastari, A.
    Chauhan, M.
    Schar, Michael
    Mareci, T. H.
    Sadleir, R. J.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2017, 10 (04) : 764 - 772
  • [42] Kazemi K, 2014, J BIOMED PHYS ENG
  • [43] Dosage Considerations for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children: A Computational Modeling Study
    Kessler, Sudha Kilaru
    Minhas, Preet
    Woods, Adam J.
    Rosen, Alyssa
    Gorman, Casey
    Bikson, Marom
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09):
  • [44] Direct current stimulation boosts hebbian plasticity in vitro
    Kronberg, Greg
    Rahman, Asif
    Sharma, Mahima
    Bikson, Marom
    Parra, Lucas C.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (02) : 287 - 301
  • [45] Direct Current Stimulation Modulates LTP and LTD: Activity Dependence and Dendritic Effects
    Kronberg, Greg
    Bridi, Morgan
    Abel, Ted
    Bikson, Marom
    Parra, Lucas C.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2017, 10 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [46] Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS
    Laakso, Ilkka
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    Koyama, Soichiro
    De Santis, Valerio
    Hirata, Akimasa
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (05) : 906 - 913
  • [47] Global signal regression strengthens association between resting-state functional connectivity and behavior
    Li, Jingwei
    Kong, Ru
    Liegeois, Raphael
    Orban, Csaba
    Tan, Yanrui
    Sun, Nanbo
    Holmes, Avram J.
    Sabuncu, Mert R.
    Ge, Tian
    Yeo, B. T. Thomas
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 196 : 126 - 141
  • [48] The first step for neuroimaging data analysis: DICOM to NIfTI conversion
    Li, Xiangrui
    Morgan, Paul S.
    Ashburner, John
    Smith, Jolinda
    Rorden, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2016, 264 : 47 - 56
  • [49] Group-regularized individual prediction: theory and application to pain
    Lindquist, Martin A.
    Krishnan, Anjali
    Lopez-Sola, Marina
    Jepma, Marieke
    Woo, Choong-Wan
    Koban, Leonie
    Roy, Mathieu
    Atlas, Lauren Y.
    Schmidt, Liane
    Chang, Luke J.
    Losin, Elizabeth A. Reynolds
    Eisenbarth, Hedwig
    Ashar, Yoni K.
    Delk, Elizabeth
    Wager, Tor D.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 145 : 274 - 287
  • [50] Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates synaptic mechanisms involved in associative learning in behaving rabbits
    Marquez-Ruiz, Javier
    Leal-Campanario, Rocio
    Sanchez-Campusano, Raudel
    Molaee-Ardekani, Behnam
    Wendling, Fabrice
    Miranda, Pedro C.
    Ruffini, Giulio
    Gruart, Agnes
    Maria Delgado-Garcia, Jose
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (17) : 6710 - 6715