Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of focal nodular hyperplasia: a matter of size

被引:42
作者
Bertin, Caroline [1 ]
Egels, Sophie [2 ]
Wagner, Mathilde [2 ,3 ]
Huynh-Charlier, Isabelle [2 ]
Vilgrain, Valerie [1 ,3 ]
Lucidarme, Olivier [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hop Beaujon, AP HP, Dept Radiol, F-92118 Clichy, France
[2] Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, AP HP, Dept Radiol, F-75651 Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris Diderot, Ctr Rech Inflammat, Fac Med X Bichat, INSERM,UMR 1149,Lab IPMA, F-75877 Paris, France
[4] Sorbonne Univ, Univ Paris 06, Lab Imagerie Biomed, CNRS UMR 7371,INSERM UMR S 1146, F-75005 Paris, France
[5] Grp Hosp Pitie Salpetriere Charles Foix, Serv Radiol Polyvalente & Oncol, F-75651 Paris, France
关键词
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Focal nodular hyperplasia; Ultrasound; Contrast medium; MRI; LIVER-LESIONS; DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE; HEPATIC ADENOMA; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-014-3280-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To assess the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) frequencies of centrifugal enhancement, spoke-wheel sign and central scar in focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) as a function of lesion size. Ninety-four FNHs were retrospectively reviewed to assess their largest diameter and enhancement pattern, including centrifugal enhancement from one central artery, spoke-wheel sign, diffuse or centripetal enhancement, central scar and late-phase washout. Mean FNH-lesion size was 3.7 +/- 2.1 cm. Only 43.6 % of FNHs had centrifugal enhancement, with a spoke-wheel pattern (23.4 %) or without (20.2 %), while 56.4 % showed diffuse or centripetal enhancement. Centrifugal enhancement was observed in 73.9 % of FNHs a parts per thousand currency sign3.1 cm and 14.6 % of FNHs > 3.1 cm (P < 10(-4)). Size and frequency of centrifugal enhancement were negatively correlated (r = -0.57, P < 10(-4)). The spoke-wheel pattern was also seen more frequently in smaller (37 %) than in larger FNHs (10.4 %) (P < 10(-3)). Late-phase washout was described in 5.3 % of FNHs and was not size-dependent. Lesions with a central scar were larger than those without, respectively, 5.7 +/- 1.7 and 3.6 +/- 2.0 cm (P = 0.012). Typical centrifugal enhancement yielding a confident FNH diagnosis is seen significantly more frequently when the lesion is a parts per thousand currency sign3.1 cm. aEuro cent CEUS yields confident diagnoses of FNHs a parts per thousand currency sign3.1 cm aEuro cent The larger the FNH, the lower the diagnostic sensitivity of CEUS aEuro cent Final diagnosis of FNHs > 3.1 cm should be obtained with MRI not CEUS.
引用
收藏
页码:2561 / 2571
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Imaging findings of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia in men and women: are they really different? [J].
Bartolotta, Tommaso Vincenzo ;
Taibbi, Adele ;
Brancatelli, Giuseppe ;
Matranga, Domenica ;
Tumbarello, Marisa ;
Midiri, Massimo ;
Lagalla, Roberto .
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2014, 119 (04) :222-230
[2]   Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings with emphasis on lesion size, depth and liver echogenicity [J].
Bartolotta, Tommaso Vincenzo ;
Taibbi, Adele ;
Matranga, Domenica ;
Malizia, Giovanni ;
Lagalla, Roberto ;
Midiri, Massimo .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (09) :2248-2256
[3]   Unclear Focal Liver Lesions in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography - Lessons to be Learned from the DEGUM Multicenter Study for the Characterization of Liver Tumors [J].
Bernatik, T. ;
Seitz, K. ;
Blank, W. ;
Schuler, A. ;
Dietrich, C. F. ;
Strobel, D. .
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2010, 31 (06) :577-581
[4]   Incidental liver lesions: diagnostic value of cadence contrast pulse sequencing (CPS) and SonoVue [J].
Bleuzen, A ;
Tranquart, F .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 :P53-P62
[5]  
Cherqui D, 1995, HEPATOLOGY, V22, P1674, DOI 10.1002/hep.1840220610
[6]   Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) -: Update 2008 [J].
Claudon, M. ;
Cosgrove, D. ;
Albrecht, T. ;
Bolondi, L. ;
Bosio, M. ;
Calliada, F. ;
Correas, J. -M. ;
Darge, K. ;
Dietrich, C. ;
D'Onofrio, M. ;
Evans, D. H. ;
Filice, C. ;
Greiner, L. ;
Jaeger, K. ;
de Jong, N. ;
Leen, E. ;
Lencioni, R. ;
Lindsell, D. ;
Martegani, A. ;
Meairs, S. ;
Nolsoe, C. ;
Piscaglia, F. ;
Ricci, P. ;
Seidel, G. ;
Skjoldbye, B. ;
Solbiati, L. ;
Thorelius, L. ;
Tranquart, F. ;
Weskott, H. P. ;
Whittingham, T. .
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2008, 29 (01) :28-44
[7]   Hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: Differential diagnosis and treatment [J].
Herman, P ;
Pugliese, V ;
Machado, MAC ;
Montagnini, AL ;
Salem, MZ ;
Bacchella, T ;
D'Albuquerque, LAC ;
Saad, WA ;
Machado, MCC ;
Pinotti, HW .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 24 (03) :372-376
[8]   Focal nodular hyperplasia: Findings at state-of-the-art MR imaging, US, CT, and pathologic analysis [J].
Hussain, SM ;
Terkivatan, T ;
Zondervan, FE ;
Lanjouw, EE ;
de Rave, S ;
Ifzermans, JNM .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2004, 24 (01) :3-17
[9]   Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: Differentiation with low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography [J].
Kim, Tae Kyoung ;
Jang, Hyun-Jung ;
Burns, Peter N. ;
Murphy-Lavallee, Jessica ;
Wilson, Stephanie R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (01) :58-66
[10]   Incidental focal solid liver lesions: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MR imaging [J].
Soussan, Michael ;
Aube, Christophe ;
Bahrami, Stephane ;
Boursier, Jerome ;
Valla, Dominique Charles ;
Vilgrain, Valerie .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (07) :1715-1725