Ethics review and conversation analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Aguinaldo, Jeffrey P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Waterloo, ON, Canada
关键词
Institutional ethics review; conversation analysis; naturally occurring data; interaction; verbal consent; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
D O I
10.1177/17470161221116552
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In this case study, I address the procedural ethics of conversation analysis (CA) and the collection of naturally occurring mundane interactions. I draw from the challenges that emerged from the institutional ethics review of the HIV, health and interaction study (the H2I Study), a CA project that sought to identify the practices through which normative assumptions of HIV and other health conditions are produced in conversations. Consistent with CA's preference for naturally occurring interactions, the H2I Study collected and analysed everyday telephone calls involving people living with HIV. This article offers practical strategies CA researchers might use to navigate two ethical concerns raised about the collection of naturally occurring mundane interactions. The first questions the merits of collecting naturally occurring mundane interactions. For those unfamiliar with CA, the specific advantages of analysing naturally occurring mundane interactions may not be self-evident. This places an evidentiary burden on CA researchers to warrant the collection of this type of data. To address this concern, I suggest demonstrating in ethics applications the analytic value of CA using publicly available interactions. The second concern questions the use of verbal consent necessary for the collection of naturally occurring mundane interactions. Like most CA research, the H2I Study required flexible informed consent protocols appropriate for spontaneous and unpredictable interactions. Drawing from within and outside the CA literature, I offer three rationales for the use of verbal consent. This article is written as a practical resource for conversation analysts seeking approval from their research ethics board (REB) and for REBs who might be unfamiliar with CA research. This article contributes to a small but growing body of literature that documents not only the kinds of challenges CA researchers encounter from institutional ethics review, but the specific procedural ethics they may employ to secure ethics approval.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 328
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conversation Analysis in Psychotherapy Research: A Methodological Review
    Dilekler, Ilknur
    STUDIES IN PSYCHOLOGY-PSIKOLOJI CALISMALARI DERGISI, 2021, 41 (01): : 1 - 34
  • [3] Conversation analysis in social work research: a scoping review
    Flinkfeldt, Marie
    Iversen, Clara
    Jorgensen, Sabine Ellung
    Monteiro, David
    Wilkins, David
    QUALITATIVE SOCIAL WORK, 2022, 21 (06) : 1011 - 1042
  • [4] Conversation Analysis and Family Therapy: A Critical Review of Methodology
    Ong, Ben
    Barnes, Scott
    Buus, Niels
    FAMILY PROCESS, 2020, 59 (02) : 460 - 476
  • [5] Conversation analysis and the psychoanalytic dialogue
    Streeck, U
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOSOMATISCHE MEDIZIN UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 1999, 45 (01): : 77 - 91
  • [6] Conversation Analysis and Classroom Interaction
    丁阿宁
    李璠
    崔静
    海外英语, 2015, (14) : 189 - 190
  • [7] Applying conversation analysis methods to online talk: A literature review
    Paulus, Trena
    Warren, Amber
    Lester, Jessica Nina
    DISCOURSE CONTEXT & MEDIA, 2016, 12 : 1 - 10
  • [8] Conversation analysis
    Chatwin, J
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2004, 12 (2-3) : 131 - 135
  • [9] Learning to perform: A conversation analytic systematic review of learning and teaching practices in performing arts lesson interactions
    Ivaldi, Antonia
    Sanderson, Alice
    Hall, Gareth
    Forrester, Michael
    LEARNING CULTURE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION, 2021, 28
  • [10] WHY BLEND CONVERSATION ANALYSIS WITH COGNITIVE GRAMMAR?
    Etelamaki, Marja
    Visapaa, Laura
    PRAGMATICS, 2014, 24 (03): : 477 - 506