Key elements of high-quality practice organisation in primary health care: a systematic review

被引:20
作者
Crossland, Lisa [1 ]
Janamian, Tina [1 ]
Jackson, Claire L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Res Excellence Primary Hlth Care Microsyst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Discipline Gen Practice, Primary Hlth Care Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Primary Care Reform Res Excellence, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/mja14.00305
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To identify elements that are integral to highquality practice and determine considerations relating to high-quality practice organisation in primary care. Study design: A narrative systematic review of published and grey literature. Data sources: Electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Emerald Insight, PsycInfo, the Primary Health Care Research and Information Service website, Google Scholar) were searched in November 2013 and used to identify articles published in English from 2002 to 2013. Reference lists of included articles were searched for relevant unpublished articles and reports. Data synthesis: Data were configured at the study level to allow for the inclusion of findings from a broad range of study types. Ten elements were most often included in the existing organisational assessment tools. A further three elements were identified from an inductive thematic analysis of descriptive articles, and were noted as important considerations in effective quality improvement in primary care settings. Conclusion: Although there are some validated tools available to primary care that identify and build quality, most are single-strategy approaches developed outside health care settings. There are currently no validated organisational improvement tools, designed specifically for primary health care, which combine all elements of practice improvement and whose use does not require extensive external facilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:S47 / S51
页数:5
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Room for improvement? Leadership, innovation culture and uptake of quality improvement methods in general practice [J].
Apekey, Tanefa A. ;
McSorley, Gerry ;
Tilling, Michelle ;
Siriwardena, A. Niroshan .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 17 (02) :311-318
[2]   US Approaches to Physician Payment: The Deconstruction of Primary Care [J].
Berenson, Robert A. ;
Rich, Eugene C. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 25 (06) :613-618
[3]   The Norwegian EUROPEP questionnaire for patient evaluation of general practice: data quality, reliability and construct validity [J].
Bjertnaes, Oyvind A. ;
Lyngstad, Inger ;
Malterud, Kirsti ;
Garratt, Andrew .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2011, 28 (03) :342-349
[4]   Measuring organizational and individual factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments [J].
Brennan, Sue E. ;
Bosch, Marije ;
Buchan, Heather ;
Green, Sally E. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 7
[5]   Clinical governance: bridging the gap between managerial and clinical approaches to quality of care [J].
Buetow, SA ;
Roland, M .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 8 (03) :184-190
[6]  
Campbell SM, 2002, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V52, pS12
[7]   A practice change model for quality improvement in primary care practice [J].
Cohen, D ;
McDaniel, RR ;
Crabtree, BF ;
Ruhe, MC ;
Weyer, SM ;
Tallia, A ;
Miller, WL ;
Goodwin, MA ;
Nutting, P ;
Solberg, LI ;
Zyzanski, SJ ;
Jaén, CR ;
Gilchrist, V ;
Stange, KC .
JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2004, 49 (03) :155-168
[8]  
Crabtree BF, 2001, J FAM PRACTICE, V50, P881
[9]   Development and pilot study of the Primary Care Practice Improvement Tool (PC-PIT): an innovative approach [J].
Crossland, Lisa ;
Janamian, Tina ;
Sheehan, Mary ;
Siskind, Victor ;
Hepworth, Julie ;
Jackson, Claire L. .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2014, 201 (03) :S52-S55
[10]   The development and psychometric evaluation of a safety climate measure for primary care [J].
de Wet, C. ;
Spence, W. ;
Mash, R. ;
Johnson, P. ;
Bowie, P. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (06) :578-584