Characterization and PI-RADS version 2 assessment of prostate cancers missed by prebiopsy 3-T multiparametric MRI: Correlation with whole-mount thin-section histopathology

被引:11
作者
Park, Kye Jin
Kim, Mi-hyun
Kim, Jeong Kon
Cho, Kyoung-Sik
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seoul 05507, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Res Inst Radiol, Seoul 05507, South Korea
关键词
Prostate; Prostate cancer; Missed prostate cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; TUMOR VOLUME; BIOPSY; RISK; ZONE; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.03.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of missed prostate cancers and their Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) score on a pre-biopsy MRI and subsequent MR-ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy. Methods: We analysed 59 prostate cancer patients who underwent a 3-T MRI prior to an MR-US fusion biopsy and subsequent radical prostatectomy. A radiologist initially reviewed these cases to correlate target lesions and pathology-proven lesions. The patients were categorized as detected or missed prostate cancer cases. Three radiologists independently assigned the PI-RADS v2 score for each case. The missed lesions were further categorized as suspicious or invisible by consensus. The clinical characteristics, PI-RADS v2 scores, and histopathologic features were thereby obtained. Results: Thirty seven (62.7%) of the 59 study cases had a detected prostate cancer and 22 (37.3%) as having missed cancer. Seventeen (77.3%) of the 22 missed patients had a clinically significant lesion. The missed cancer cases had a smaller tumour volume, and higher ADC ratio than the detected cancer cases. Fourteen (63.6%) of the missed lesions were not visible on MRI, even though 71.4% of these cancers were clinically significant. Invisible but clinically significant cancers had a tumour volume below 1 cm(3) in 70% of cases. Conclusions: A negative MRI result does not rule out the current PI-RADS v2 definition of a clinically significant prostate cancer as these tumours can be missed if their volume is below 1 cm(3).
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 180
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[2]  
Antonelli A, 2014, UROLOGY, V83, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.056
[3]   Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-guided In-bore Biopsy to MRI-ultrasound Fusion and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies [J].
Arsov, Christian ;
Rabenalt, Robert ;
Blondin, Dirk ;
Quentin, Michael ;
Hiester, Andreas ;
Godehardt, Erhard ;
Gabbert, Helmut E. ;
Becker, Nikolaus ;
Antoch, Gerald ;
Albers, Peter ;
Schimmoeller, Lars .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (04) :713-720
[4]   Tumor Target Volume for Focal Therapy of Prostate Cancerd-Does Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Allow for a Reliable Estimation? [J].
Cornud, F. ;
Khoury, Gaby ;
Bouazza, Naim ;
Beuvon, Frederic ;
Peyromaure, Michael ;
Flam, Thierry ;
Zerbib, Marc ;
Legmann, Paul ;
Delongchamps, Nicolas B. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (05) :1272-1279
[5]   What kind of prostate cancers do we miss on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? [J].
De Visschere, Pieter Julien Luc ;
Naesens, Leslie ;
Libbrecht, Louis ;
Van Praet, Charles ;
Lumen, Nicolaas ;
Fonteyne, Valerie ;
Pattyn, Eva ;
Villeirs, Geert .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (04) :1098-1107
[6]   Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading [J].
Dong, Fei ;
Jones, J. Stephen ;
Stephenson, Andrew J. ;
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina ;
Reuther, Alwyn M. ;
Klein, Eric A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (03) :896-900
[7]   Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy gleason score 6 to Harbor a higher grade cancer [J].
Gofrit, Ofer N. ;
Zorn, Kevin C. ;
Taxy, Jerome B. ;
Lin, Shang ;
Zagaja, Gregory P. ;
Steinberg, Gary D. ;
Shalhav, Arieh L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (05) :1925-1928
[8]   Transition Zone Prostate Cancer: Detection and Localization with 3-T Multiparametric MR Imaging [J].
Hoeks, Caroline M. A. ;
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Yakar, Derya ;
de Kaa, Christina A. Hulsbergen-van ;
Feuth, Ton ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (01) :207-217
[9]   Prediction of Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancers diagnosed via multi (≥12)-core prostate biopsy [J].
Hong, Sung Kyu ;
Han, Byung Kyu ;
Lee, Seung Tae ;
Kim, Sung Soo ;
Min, Kyung Eun ;
Jeong, Sung Jin ;
Jeong, Hyeon ;
Byun, Seok-Soo ;
Lee, Hak Jong ;
Choe, Gheeyoung ;
Lee, Sang Eun .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 27 (02) :271-276
[10]   MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis [J].
Kasivisvanathan, V ;
Rannikko, A. S. ;
Borghi, M. ;
Panebianco, V ;
Mynderse, L. A. ;
Vaarala, M. H. ;
Briganti, A. ;
Budaus, L. ;
Hellawell, G. ;
Hindley, R. G. ;
Roobol, M. J. ;
Eggener, S. ;
Ghei, M. ;
Villers, A. ;
Bladou, F. ;
Villeirs, G. M. ;
Virdi, J. ;
Boxler, S. ;
Robert, G. ;
Singh, P. B. ;
Venderink, W. ;
Hadaschik, B. A. ;
Ruffion, A. ;
Hu, J. C. ;
Margolis, D. ;
Crouzet, S. ;
Klotz, L. ;
Taneja, S. S. ;
Pinto, P. ;
Gill, I ;
Allen, C. ;
Giganti, F. ;
Freeman, A. ;
Morris, S. ;
Punwani, S. ;
Williams, N. R. ;
Brew-Graves, C. ;
Deeks, J. ;
Takwoingi, Y. ;
Emberton, M. ;
Moore, C. M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (19) :1767-1777