Reconsidering union wage effects: Surveying new evidence on an old topic

被引:57
作者
Hirsch, BT [1 ]
机构
[1] IZA Bonn, Bonn, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s12122-004-1035-4
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
I examine evidence on private sector union wage gaps in the United States. The consensus opinion among labor economists of an average union premium of roughly 15 percent is called into question. Two forms of measurement error bias downward standard wage gap estimates. Match bias results from Census earnings imputation procedures that do not include union status as a match criterion. Downward bias is roughly equal to the proportion of workers with imputed earnings, currently about 30 percent. Misclassification of union status causes additional attenuation in union gap measures. This bias has worsened as private sector density has declined, since an increasing proportion of workers designated as union are instead nonunion workers. Corrections for misclassification and match bias lead to estimated union gaps substantially higher than standard estimates, but with less of a downward trend since the mid 1980s. Private sector union gaps corrected for these biases are estimated from the CPS for 1973-2001. The uncorrected estimate for 2001 is. 13 log points. Correction for match bias increases the gap to .18 log points; further correction for misclassification bias, based on an assumed 2 percent error rate, increases the gap to .24. Reexamination of the skill-upgrading hypothesis leads to the conclusion that higher union gap estimates are plausible. The conventional wisdom of a 15 percent union wage premium warrants reexamination.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 266
页数:34
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   JOB QUEUES AND THE UNION STATUS OF WORKERS [J].
ABOWD, JM ;
FARBER, HS .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1982, 35 (03) :354-367
[2]  
ABOWD JM, 2001, SIMULTANEOUS DETERMI
[3]   UNION EFFECTS ON PRODUCTIVITY, PROFITS, AND GROWTH - HAS THE LONG RUN ARRIVED [J].
ADDISON, JT ;
HIRSCH, BT .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 1989, 7 (01) :72-105
[4]  
Angrist J. D., 1999, HDB LABOR EC A, V3, P1277, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03004-7
[5]   Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments [J].
Angrist, JD ;
Krueger, AB .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 15 (04) :69-85
[6]  
BLANCHFLOWER DG, 2002, NBER WORKING PAPER, V9395
[7]  
BLANCHFLOWER DG, 1999, ESSAYS HONOR B CORRY, V2, P3
[8]  
BLANCHFLOWER DG, 1992, LABOR MARKET I FUTUR, P56
[9]   WAGE DETERMINATION IN UNION AND NONUNION SECTORS [J].
BLOCH, FE ;
KUSKIN, MS .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1978, 31 (02) :183-192
[10]   Response error and the union wage differential [J].
Bollinger, CR .
SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2001, 68 (01) :60-76