Technical Evaluation Method for Physical Property Changes due to Environmental Degradation of Grout-Injection Repair Materials for Water-Leakage Cracks

被引:21
作者
Jiang, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Oh, Kyu-hwan [3 ]
Kim, Soo-Yeon [4 ]
He, Xingyang [5 ]
Oh, Sang-keun [6 ]
机构
[1] HuBei Univ Technol, Sch Civil Architecture & Environm, Wuhan 432200, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Architecture, Grad Sch, Seoul 01811, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Railway Construct Engn, Seoul 01811, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Waterproofing Technol Res Ctr, Seoul 01811, South Korea
[5] HuBei Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Environm, Wuhan 432200, Hubei, Peoples R China
[6] Seoul Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Architecture, Seoul 01811, South Korea
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2019年 / 9卷 / 09期
关键词
grout injection material; environmental degradation factors; physical property change; water leakage crack; leakage repair; concrete structure;
D O I
10.3390/app9091740
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Leakage in below-grade concrete structures are repaired using various types of grout-injection materials, but the selection of optimal material types with a consideration of the environmental degradation factors are not conducted. Different degradation factors can act on the waterproofing membranes or grout-injection materials simultaneously. Especially in the early stages of installation, the injected grout materials in the cracks for leakage repair or for reforming damaged waterproofing layers are subject to complex forms of degradation factors. In such cases, physical property changes to the materials can reduce the waterproofing performance of the grout-injection materials. In this study, a technical evaluation regime is proposed for selecting the optimal repair material to be used in underground concrete structure leakage cracks. In this study, six environmental degradation factors (thermal stress, chemical corrosion, erosion due to ground water flow, hydrostatic pressure, substrate movement, and humidity on concrete surface) are identified. Corresponding evaluation methods based on the ISO TS 16774 test method series were used for each factor to assess the performance evaluation of four different types of grout-injection materials (acrylic resin, epoxy resin, polyurethane foam, and synthetic polymerized rubber gel). Based on the test results, a new comprehensive evaluation regime is presented that allows a quantitative performance comparison between each type of grout-injection material.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Ahn D.S., 2015, THESIS
[2]   Viscosity and Waterproofing Performance Evaluation of Synthetic Polymerized Rubber Gel (SPRG) after Screw Mixing [J].
Ahn, Dong Soo ;
Oh, Kyu Hwan ;
Park, Jin Sang ;
Oh, Sang Keun .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (10)
[3]  
An K.W., 2017, Archit. Inst. Korea, V37, P1073
[4]  
Bean D.L., 1985, EPOXY RESIN GROUTING
[5]  
박완구, 2017, [journal of the regional association of architectural institute of korea, 대한건축학회연합논문집], V19, P131
[6]  
Chang S.J., 2005, J ARCH I KOREA, V49, P57
[7]  
International Organization for Standardization Technical Committee 71 Subcommittee 7 Working Group 3, 2011, 164752011 ISO TR
[8]  
International Organization for Standardization Technical Committee 71 Subcommittee 7 Working Group 3, 2017, 167742011 ISO TS
[9]   Molecularly designed, dual-doped mesoporous carbon/SWCNT nanoshields for lithium battery electrode materials [J].
Jang, Ye-Ri ;
Kim, Ju-Myung ;
Lee, Jung-Han ;
Cho, Sung-Ju ;
Kim, Guntae ;
Ju, Young-Wan ;
Yeon, Sun-Hwa ;
Yoo, JongTae ;
Lee, Sang-Young .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A, 2016, 4 (39) :14996-15005
[10]  
Kim D.B., 2011, J KOREA CONCR I, V5, P611