Surveillance of TSH-suppressive levothyroxine treatment in thyroid cancer patients:: TRH testing versus basal TSH determination by a third generation assay

被引:1
作者
Görges, R
Saller, B
Eising, EG
Quadbeck, B
Mann, K
Bockisch, A
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Nucl Med, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Endocrinol, D-45122 Essen, Germany
关键词
thyroid cancer; TSH suppression; TRH testing; ultrasensitive TSH; third generation assay;
D O I
10.1055/s-2002-34993
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective, design and methods: Although TRH testing has been eliminated in the diagnosis of most benign thyroid diseases, it is still controversial whether or not it can be replaced by ultrasensitive determination of basal TSH for monitoring optimal TSH suppression in thyroid cancer patients. We compared basal and TRH-stimulated TSH values measured by a 2(nd) generation assay (lower detection limit 0.1 mU/I) and by a 3(rd) generation assay (lower detection limit 0.005 mU/l) in 209 thyroidectomized thyroid cancer patients under suppressive levothyroxine treatment. Results: In the 2n(d) generation assay all patients had basal TSH values < 0.1 mU/l (criterion of admission in the study), and the TRH-stimulated TSH values were above the lower detection limit in 47% of the patients (range <0.1-1.0 mU/l). In the 3(rd) generation assay TSH was above the lower detection limit in 67% under basal conditions (range <0.005-0.098 mU/l), and in 83% after TRH stimulation (range <0.005-1.000 mU/l). We observed close correlations (p<0.001) between basal and TRH-stimulated TSH in the V generation assay (r=0.86), between TRH-stimulated TSH in the 2(nd) and 3(rd) generation assay (r=0.95), and between TRH-stimulated TSH in the 2(nd) generation assay and basal TSH in the V generation assay (r=0.73). The ratio between TRH-stimulated and basal TSH values was in the average range 7-9 : 1. Subdividing the patients in three subgroups based on the TRH-stimulated TSH values from the 2(nd) generation assay, the corresponding basal TSH values (median and [25.-75. percentile]) from the 31 generation assay were <0.005 [<0.005-0.010] mU/l in subgroup A (2(nd) generation stim. TSH: <0.15 mU/1), 0.032 [0.021-0.040] mU/1 in subgroup B (2(nd) generation stim. TSH: 0.15-0.4 mU/1), and 0.066 [0.046-0.085] mU/l in subgroup C (2(nd) generation stim. TSH: greater than or equal to0.5 mU/l). Conclusions: Even in those thyroid cancer patients where a high degree of TSH suppression is the therapeutic goal, 3(rd) generation TSH assays enable a reliable adjustment of the levothyroxine dose by basal TSH determinations. In laboratories still using 2(nd) generation assays, the monitoring of maximal TSH suppression in patients with high-risk thyroid cancer should be performed by TRH testing.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 360
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] CARDIAC EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM THYROTROPIN-SUPPRESSIVE THERAPY WITH LEVOTHYROXINE
    BIONDI, B
    FAZIO, S
    CARELLA, C
    AMATO, G
    CITTADINI, A
    LUPOLI, G
    SACCA, L
    BELLASTELLA, A
    LOMBARDI, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1993, 77 (02) : 334 - 338
  • [2] Non-suppressed thyrotropin and elevated thyroglobulin are independent predictors of recurrence in differentiated thyroid carcinoma
    Böhm, J
    Kosma, VM
    Eskelinen, M
    Hollmen, S
    Niskanen, M
    Tulla, H
    Alhava, E
    Niskanen, L
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1999, 141 (05) : 460 - 467
  • [3] LEVOTHYROXINE DOSE REQUIREMENTS FOR THYROTROPIN SUPPRESSION IN THE TREATMENT OF DIFFERENTIATED THYROID-CANCER
    BURMEISTER, LA
    GOUMAZ, MO
    MARIASH, CN
    OPPENHEIMER, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1992, 75 (02) : 344 - 350
  • [4] Charrié A, 1999, ANN ENDOCRINOL-PARIS, V60, P40
  • [5] Thyrotropin suppression and disease progression in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: Results from the National Thyroid Cancer Treatment Cooperative Registry
    Cooper, DS
    Specker, B
    Ho, M
    Sperling, M
    Ladenson, PW
    Ross, DS
    Ain, KB
    Bigos, ST
    Brierley, JD
    Haugen, BR
    Klein, I
    Robbins, J
    Sherman, SI
    Taylor, T
    Maxon, HR
    [J]. THYROID, 1998, 8 (09) : 737 - 744
  • [6] HORMONE REPLACEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA OF THYROID
    CREUTZIG, H
    KALLFELZ, I
    HAINDL, H
    SCHULLE, R
    HUNDESHAGEN, H
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1977, 102 (48) : 1763 - 1766
  • [7] DELANGE WE, 1989, NETH J MED, V35, P11
  • [8] Thyrotropin may not be the dominant growth factor in benign and malignant thyroid tumors
    Derwahl, M
    Broecker, M
    Kraiem, Z
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1999, 84 (03) : 829 - 834
  • [9] Dietlein M, 1999, NUKLEARMED, V38, P221
  • [10] ERNE P, 1983, SCHWEIZ MED WSCHR, V113, P1922