Optimization of HDR brachytherapy dose distributions using linear programming with penalty costs

被引:42
作者
Alterovitz, Ron
Lessard, Etienne
Pouliot, Jean
Hsu, I-Chow Joe
O'Brien, James F.
Goldberg, Ken
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Ind Engn & Operat Res, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
HDR; optimization; conformal radiotherapy; prostate therapy; IPSA;
D O I
10.1118/1.2349685
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Prostate cancer is increasingly treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, a type of radiotherapy in which a radioactive source is guided through catheters temporarily implanted in the prostate. Clinicians must set dwell times for the source inside the catheters so the resulting dose distribution minimizes deviation from dose prescriptions that conform to patient-specific anatomy. The primary contribution of this paper is to take the well-established dwell times optimization problem defined by Inverse Planning by Simulated Annealing (IPSA) developed at UCSF and exactly formulate it as a linear programming (LP) problem. Because LP problems can be solved exactly and deterministically, this formulation provides strong performance guarantees: one can rapidly find the dwell times solution that globally minimizes IPSA's objective function for any patient case and clinical criteria parameters. For a sample of 20 prostates with volume ranging from 23 to 103 cc, the new LP method optimized dwell times in less than 15 s per case on a standard PC. The dwell times solutions currently being obtained clinically using simulated annealing (SA), a probabilistic method, were quantitatively compared to the mathematically optimal solutions obtained using the LP method. The LP method resulted in significantly improved objective function values compared to SA (P=1.54 X 10(-7)), but none of the dosimetric indices indicated a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01). The results indicate that solutions generated by the current version of IPSA are clinically equivalent to the mathematically optimal solutions. (c) 2006 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:4012 / 4019
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
AART E, 1989, INTERSCIENCE SERIES
[2]   Registration of MR prostate images with biomechanical modeling and nonlinear parameter estimation [J].
Alterovitz, R ;
Goldberg, K ;
Pouliot, J ;
Hsu, ICJ ;
Kim, Y ;
Noworolski, SM ;
Kurhanewicz, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (02) :446-454
[3]  
Alterovitz R, 2004, P ANN INT IEEE EMBS, V26, P1722
[4]  
[Anonymous], MATH ITS APPL
[5]   Inverse treatment planning based on MRI for HDR prostate brachytherapy [J].
Citrin, D ;
Ning, H ;
Guion, P ;
Li, G ;
Susil, RC ;
Miller, RW ;
Lessard, E ;
Pouliot, J ;
Huchen, X ;
Capala, J ;
Coleman, CN ;
Camphausen, K ;
Ménard, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (04) :1267-1275
[6]   3D inverse treatment planning for the tandem and ovoid applicator in cervical cancer [J].
DeWitt, KD ;
Hsu, ICJ ;
Speight, J ;
Weinberg, VK ;
Lessard, E ;
Pouliot, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (04) :1270-1274
[7]   STOCHASTIC RELAXATION, GIBBS DISTRIBUTIONS, AND THE BAYESIAN RESTORATION OF IMAGES [J].
GEMAN, S ;
GEMAN, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1984, 6 (06) :721-741
[8]  
HSU CJ, 2004, BRACHYTHERAPY, V3, P147
[9]  
*ILOG INC, 2005, ILO CPLEX HIGH PERF
[10]   The use of linear programming in optimization of HDR implant dose distributions [J].
Jozsef, G ;
Streeter, OE ;
Astrahan, MA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (05) :751-760