Field-scale modeling of tree-crop interactions: Challenges and development needs

被引:109
作者
Luedeling, Eike [1 ,2 ]
Smethurst, Philip J. [3 ]
Baudron, Frederic [4 ]
Bayala, Jules [5 ]
Huth, Neil I. [6 ]
van Noordwijk, Kleine [7 ]
Ong, Chin K. [8 ]
Mulia, Rachmat [7 ]
Lusiana, Betha [7 ]
Muthuri, Catherine [1 ]
Sinclair, Fergus L. [1 ,9 ]
机构
[1] World Agroforestry Ctr ICRAF, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
[2] Univ Bonn, Ctr Dev Res ZEF, Bonn, Germany
[3] CSIRO, Private Bag 12, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[4] ILRI, CIMMYT Ethiopia, Shola Campus, Addis Ababa 5689, Ethiopia
[5] ICRAF WCA Sahel, World Agroforestry Ctr ICRAF, BP E5118, Bamako, Mali
[6] CSIRO, 203 Tor St, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[7] JL CIFOR, Southeast Asia Reg Programme, World Agroforestry Ctr ICRAF, Bogor 16001, Indonesia
[8] Univ Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Crops Future Res Ctr, Semenyih 43500, Selangor, Malaysia
[9] Bangor Univ, Bangor LL57 2DG, Gwynedd, Wales
关键词
Agroforestry; APSIM; Biophysical; Modeling; Process-based; WaNuLCAS; KARITE VITELLARIA-PARADOXA; AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS; SIMULATION-MODEL; YIELD RESPONSE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOIL-WATER; HYDRAULIC REDISTRIBUTION; SILVOARABLE AGROFORESTRY; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.005
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Agroforestry has attracted considerable attention in recent years because of its potential to reduce poverty, improve food security, reduce land degradation and mitigate climate change. However, progress in promoting agroforestry is held back because decision-makers lack reliable tools to accurately predict yields from tree-crop mixtures. Amongst the key challenges faced in developing such tools are the complexity of agroforestry, including interactions between various system components, and the large spatial domains and timescales over which trees and crops interact. A model that is flexible enough to simulate any agroforestry system globally should be able to address competition and complementarity above and below ground between trees and crops for light, water and nutrients. Most agroforestry practices produce multiple products including food, fiber and fuel, as well as income, shade and other ecosystem services, all of which need to be simulated for a comprehensive understanding of the overall system to emerge. Several agroforestry models and model families have been developed, including SCUAF, HyPAR, Hi-SAFE/Yield-SAFE and WaNuLCAS, but as of 2015 their use has remained limited for reasons including insufficient flexibility, restricted ability to simulate interactions, extensive parameterization needs or lack of model maintenance. An efficient approach to improving the flexibility and durability of agroforestry models is to integrate them into a well established modular crop modeling framework like APSIM. This framework currently focuses on field-scale crops and pastures, but has the capability to reuse or interoperate with existing models including tree, livestock and landscape models, it uses parameters that are intuitive and relatively easy to measure, and it allows scenario analysis that can include farm-scale economics. Various types of agroforestry systems are currently being promoted in many contexts, and the impacts of these innovations are often unclear. Rapid progress in reliable modeling of tree and crop performance for such systems is needed to ensure that agroforestry fulfills its potential to contribute to reducing poverty, improving food security and fostering sustainability. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 69
页数:19
相关论文
共 228 条
[1]   Ad Hoc Modeling in Agronomy: What Have We Learned in the Last 15 Years? [J].
Affholder, F. ;
Tittonell, P. ;
Corbeels, M. ;
Roux, S. ;
Motisi, N. ;
Tixier, P. ;
Wery, J. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2012, 104 (03) :735-748
[2]   Mapping the effect of spatial and temporal variation in climate and soils on Eucalyptus plantation production with 3-PG, a process-based growth model [J].
Almeida, Auro C. ;
Siggins, Anders ;
Batista, Thiago R. ;
Beadle, Chris ;
Fonseca, Sebastiao ;
Loos, Rodolfo .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 259 (09) :1730-1740
[3]  
Anderson L. S., 1993, Agroforestry Abstracts, V6, P57
[4]  
[Anonymous], SCUAF SOIL CHANGES A
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SOLUTE MOVEMENT RHIZ, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780195124927.001.0001
[6]  
[Anonymous], HYDROL EARTH SYST SC
[7]  
[Anonymous], ONL P 8 AS C INF TEC
[8]   A methodology for developing simulation models of complex systems [J].
Aumann, Craig A. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 202 (3-4) :385-396
[9]  
Barrios E., 2012, SOIL ECOLOGY ECOSYST, P315
[10]   CABALA: a linked carbon, water and nitrogen model of forest growth for silvicultural decision support [J].
Battaglia, M ;
Sands, P ;
White, D ;
Mummery, D .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 193 (1-2) :251-282