Supporting public involvement in research design and grant development: a case study of a public involvement award scheme managed by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Design Service (RDS)

被引:16
作者
Boote, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Twiddy, Maureen [1 ]
Baird, Wendy [1 ]
Birks, Yvonne [1 ]
Clarke, Clare [1 ]
Beever, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Hlth Res NIHR Res Design Serv Yorkshire, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
grant development; public involvement; research design; support and resources; CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT; TRIAL; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1111/hex.12130
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background It is good practice for the public to be involved in developing health research. Resources should be available for researchers to fund the involvement of the public in the development of their grants. Objective To describe a funding award scheme to support public involvement in grant development, managed by an NIHR Research Design Service (RDS). Case examples of how the award contributed to successful grant applications and findings from a recent evaluation of the scheme are presented. Design A case study of resource provision to support public involvement activities in one region of England. Participants University and NHS-based researchers, and members of the public. Findings Between 2009 and 2012, the RDS approved 45 public involvement funding awards (totalling nearly 19 000). These awards contributed to 27 submitted applications at the time of writing, of which 11 were successful (totalling over (sic)7.5 million). The evaluation revealed difficulties encountered by some researchers when involving the public in grant development, which led to suggestions about how the scheme could be improved. Conclusion This award scheme represents an efficient method of providing researchers with resources to involve the public in grant development and would appear to represent good value for money.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1493
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   What patients want - Consumer involvement in the design of a randomized controlled trial of routine oxygen supplementation after acute stroke [J].
Ali, K ;
Roffe, C ;
Crome, P .
STROKE, 2006, 37 (03) :865-871
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, RES GOV FRAM HLTH SO
[3]  
Boote J., 2011, INT J INTERDISCIP SO, V5, P91, DOI [10.18848/1833-1882/cgp/v05i11/59313, DOI 10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/V05I11/59313]
[4]   Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: A narrative review of case examples [J].
Boote, Jonathan ;
Baird, Wendy ;
Sutton, Anthea .
HEALTH POLICY, 2011, 102 (2-3) :105-116
[5]   Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: A narrative review of case examples [J].
Boote, Jonathan ;
Baird, Wendy ;
Beecroft, Claire .
HEALTH POLICY, 2010, 95 (01) :10-23
[6]   'But is it a question worth asking?' A reflective case study describing how public involvement can lead to researchers' ideas being abandoned [J].
Boote, Jonathan D. ;
Dalgleish, Mary ;
Freeman, Janet ;
Jones, Zena ;
Miles, Marianne ;
Rodgers, Helen .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (03) :440-451
[7]  
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, CIT ENG FRAM
[8]   Mobilising the experiential knowledge of clinicians, patients and carers for applied health-care research [J].
Carter, Pam ;
Beech, Roger ;
Coxon, Domenica ;
Thomas, Martin J. ;
Jinks, Clare .
CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2013, 8 (03) :307-320
[9]   Involving communities in the design of clinical trial protocols: The BAN Study in Lilongwe, Malawi [J].
Corneli, Amy L. ;
Piwoz, Ellen G. ;
Bentley, Margaret E. ;
Moses, Agnes ;
Nkhoma, Jacqueline R. ;
Tohill, Beth Carlton ;
Adair, Linda ;
Mtimuni, Beatrice ;
Ahmed, Yusuf ;
Duerr, Ann ;
Kazembe, Peter ;
van der Horst, Charles .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 28 (01) :59-67
[10]   Consulting parents about the design of a randomized controlled trial of osteopathy for children with cerebral palsy [J].
Edwards, Vanessa ;
Wyatt, Katrina ;
Logan, Stuart ;
Britten, Nicky .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2011, 14 (04) :429-438