Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool

被引:216
作者
Fugard, Andrew J. B. [1 ]
Potts, Henry W. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Res Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, England
[2] UCL, Inst Hlth Informat, London NW1 2DA, England
关键词
sample size determination; power analysis; thematic analysis; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; DATA SATURATION; POWER; STRENGTHS;
D O I
10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Thematic analysis is frequently used to analyse qualitative data in psychology, healthcare, social research and beyond. An important stage in planning a study is determining how large a sample size may be required, however current guidelines for thematic analysis are varied, ranging from around 2 to over 400 and it is unclear how to choose a value from the space in between. Some guidance can also not be applied prospectively. This paper introduces a tool to help users think about what would be a useful sample size for their particular context when investigating patterns across participants. The calculation depends on (a) the expected population theme prevalence of the least prevalent theme, derived either from prior knowledge or based on the prevalence of the rarest themes considered worth uncovering, e.g. 1 in 10, 1 in 100; (b) the number of desired instances of the theme; and (c) the power of the study. An adequately powered study will have a high likelihood of finding sufficient themes of the desired prevalence. This calculation can then be used alongside other considerations. We illustrate how to use the method to calculate sample size before starting a study and achieved power given a sample size, providing tables of answers and code for use in the free software, R. Sample sizes are comparable to those found in the literature, for example to have 80% power to detect two instances of a theme with 10% prevalence, 29 participants are required. Increasing power, increasing the number of instances or decreasing prevalence increases the sample size needed. We do not propose this as a ritualistic requirement for study design, but rather as a pragmatic supporting tool to help plan studies using thematic analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 684
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem
    Bacchetti, P
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7348): : 1271 - 1273
  • [2] Baker S.E., 2012, Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research, P1
  • [3] Ball J., 2002, CRITICAL CARE, V6, P4
  • [4] Quality criteria under methodological pluralism: Implications for conducting and evaluating research
    Barker, C
    Pistrang, N
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 35 (3-4) : 201 - 212
  • [5] Barker C., 2005, Research methods in clinical psychology: An introduction for students and practitioners, V2nd, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0470013435.CH6, 10.1002/0470013435.ch6, 10.1002/0470013435, DOI 10.1002/0470013435]
  • [6] Clinical practice as natural laboratory for psychotherapy research - A guide to case-based time-series analysis
    Borckardt, Jeffrey J.
    Nash, Michael R.
    Murphy, Martin D.
    Moore, Mark
    Shaw, Darlene
    O'Neil, Patrick
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2008, 63 (02) : 77 - 95
  • [7] Bradley J., 2013, CHILD FAMILY CLIN PS, V1, P8, DOI DOI 10.53841/BPSCYPF.2013.1.1.8
  • [8] Braun V., 2013, SUCCESSFUL QUALITATI
  • [9] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [10] Sample size calculations for pilot randomized trials: a confidence interval approach
    Cocks, Kim
    Torgerson, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (02) : 197 - 201