Why the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrilliator (AVID) trial sets the wrong precedent

被引:6
作者
Fogoros, RN [1 ]
机构
[1] ALLEGHENY UNIV HLTH SCI,PITTSBURGH,PA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00510-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Although the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillator (AVID) trial is being hailed as a landmark study, it is based on false premises of logic, science, and ethics. Allowing AVID to set a precedent will encourage poorly designed clinical trials in the future, especially in an era of growing economic constraint.
引用
收藏
页码:762 / &
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条