Sunspot Time Series: Passive and Active Intervals

被引:5
作者
Zieba, S. [1 ]
Nieckarz, Z. [2 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Astron Observ, PL-30244 Krakow, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Phys, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
关键词
Spotless days; Solar phase tracking; Waldmeier effect; Prediction; SOLAR-CYCLES; PREDICTION; AMPLITUDE; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1007/s11207-014-0498-6
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Solar activity slowly and irregularly decreases from the first spotless day (FSD) in the declining phase of the old sunspot cycle and systematically, but also in an irregular way, increases to the new cycle maximum after the last spotless day (LSD). The time interval between the first and the last spotless day can be called the passive interval (PI), while the time interval from the last spotless day to the first one after the new cycle maximum is the related active interval (AI). Minima of solar cycles are inside PIs, while maxima are inside AIs. In this article, we study the properties of passive and active intervals to determine the relation between them. We have found that some properties of PIs, and related AIs, differ significantly between two group of solar cycles; this has allowed us to classify Cycles 8 -aEuro parts per thousand 15 as passive cycles, and Cycles 17 -aEuro parts per thousand 23 as active ones. We conclude that the solar activity in the PI declining phase (a descending phase of the previous cycle) determines the strength of the approaching maximum in the case of active cycles, while the activity of the PI rising phase (a phase of the ongoing cycle early growth) determines the strength of passive cycles. This can have implications for solar dynamo models. Our approach indicates the important role of solar activity during the declining and the rising phases of the solar-cycle minimum.
引用
收藏
页码:2705 / 2726
页数:22
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1939, Astronomische Mitteilungen der Eidgenossischen Sternwarte Zurich
  • [2] A robust correlation between growth rate and amplitude of solar cycles:: Consequences for prediction methods
    Cameron, R.
    Schuessler, M.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 685 (02) : 1291 - 1296
  • [3] Solar cycle prediction using precursors and flux transport models
    Cameron, R.
    Schuessler, M.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 659 (01) : 801 - 811
  • [4] Limits to solar cycle predictability: Cross-equatorial flux plumes
    Cameron, R. H.
    Dasi-Espuig, M.
    Jiang, J.
    Isik, E.
    Schmitt, D.
    Schuessler, M.
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2013, 557
  • [5] Are the strengths of solar cycles determined by converging flows towards the activity belts?
    Cameron, R. H.
    Schuessler, M.
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2012, 548
  • [6] SURFACE FLUX TRANSPORT MODELING FOR SOLAR CYCLES 15-21: EFFECTS OF CYCLE-DEPENDENT TILT ANGLES OF SUNSPOT GROUPS
    Cameron, R. H.
    Jiang, J.
    Schmitt, D.
    Schuessler, M.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 719 (01) : 264 - 270
  • [7] From the Wolf number to the International Sunspot Index: 25 years of SIDC
    Clette, Frederic
    Berghmans, David
    Vanlommel, Petra
    Van der Linden, Ronald A. M.
    Koeckelenbergh, Andre
    Wauters, Laurence
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2007, 40 (07) : 919 - 928
  • [8] Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle
    Dasi-Espuig, M.
    Solanki, S. K.
    Krivova, N. A.
    Cameron, R.
    Penuela, T.
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2010, 518
  • [9] The Waldmeier effect: An artifact of the definition of Wolf sunspot number?
    Dikpati, Mausumi
    Gilman, Peter A.
    De Toma, Giuliana
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2008, 673 (01): : L99 - L101
  • [10] Gleissberg W., 1939, The Observatory, V62, P158