Euthymic patients with predominantly manic polarity avoid happy faces in a dot probe task

被引:4
作者
Wenzel, Martina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Althen, Heike [1 ]
Veeh, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Reif, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ, Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapy, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat Med, Wurzburg, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich TU, Dept Neurol, Munich, Germany
关键词
Bipolar disorder; Dot-probe task; Attentional bias; Predominant polarity; Emotion regulation; Euthymic phase; EMOTION REGULATION QUESTIONNAIRE; BIPOLAR AFFECTIVE-DISORDER; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; NEGATIVE AFFECT; COGNITIVE VULNERABILITY; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; REGULATION STRATEGIES; POSITIVE AFFECT; GERMAN VERSION; EYE TRACKING;
D O I
10.1186/s40345-022-00262-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Some studies suggest a mood-congruent attentional bias in bipolar patients. However, for euthymic patients, especially in dependence on the predominant polarity, there is little and inconsistent data. A clearer understanding of emotion-related attentional biases and their relationship to dysfunctional emotion regulation could help improving the diagnostics and treatment of bipolar disorder (BD). Twenty bipolar patients in a depressive state (BP-acute-D), 32 euthymic patients with manic (BP-euth-M) or depressive (BP-euth-D) predominant polarity, and 20 healthy control participants (HC) performed a dot-probe task (DPT) with happy and sad faces presented for 250 ms or 1250 ms in two different runs. Emotion regulation strategies were assessed with two questionnaires. Results In the short presentation condition of the DPT, BP-euth-M showed less attention for happy faces than HC (p = .03, r = - 0.48). BP-acute-D scored lower in cognitive reappraisal and putting into perspective and higher in suppression, catastrophizing, and rumination than HC. BP-euth-M scored higher in rumination and BP-euth-D lower in putting into perspective and higher in catastrophizing than HC. In BP-euth-D and HC, bias scores for sad faces in the longer presentation condition and reappraisal scores correlated positively. Conclusions Results of the DPT suggest an avoidance of happy faces for BP-euth-M which we interpret as a protection mechanism for triggers of mania. That individuals who apply more reappraisal show more selective attention to sad faces could on the one hand reflect a mental effort in reevaluating the sad emotional input and on the other hand a greater tolerance for it.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Emotion Regulation Questionnaire - A German version of the ERQ by Gross and John
    Abler, Birgit
    Kessler, Henrik
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICA, 2009, 55 (03): : 144 - 152
  • [2] Ackenheil M., 1999, MINI MINI INT NEUROP
  • [3] Regulating the blink: cognitive reappraisal modulates attention
    Adam, Ruth
    Schoenfelder, Sandra
    Forneck, Johanna
    Wessa, Michele
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [4] Cognitive vulnerability to unipolar and bipolar mood disorders
    Alloy, Lauren B.
    Abramson, Lyn Y.
    Walshaw, Patricia D.
    Neeren, Amy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 25 (07) : 726 - 754
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, NEUROPSYCHIATRIE
  • [6] Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis
    Armstrong, Thomas
    Olatunji, Bunmi O.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 32 (08) : 704 - 723
  • [7] The neuropsychology and neuroanatomy of bipolar affective disorder: a critical review
    Bearden, CE
    Hoffman, KM
    Cannon, TD
    [J]. BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2001, 3 (03) : 106 - 150
  • [8] Psychomotor Retardation in Depression: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic, Pathophysiologic, and Therapeutic Implications
    Bennabi, Djamila
    Vandel, Pierre
    Papaxanthis, Charalambos
    Pozzo, Thierry
    Haffen, Emmanuel
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 2013
  • [9] The effects of medication and current mood upon facial emotion recognition: findings from a large bipolar disorder cohort study
    Bilderbeck, Amy C.
    Atkinson, Lauren Z.
    Geddes, John R.
    Goodwin, Guy M.
    Harmer, Catherine J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 31 (03) : 320 - 326
  • [10] Cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: a systematic review of meta-analyses
    Bortolato, Beatrice
    Miskowiak, Kamilla W.
    Koehler, Cristiano A.
    Vieta, Eduard
    Carvalho, Andre F.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2015, 11 : 3111 - 3125